Bug#1095863: release.debian.org: Raising the i386 baseline for Trixie to include SSE2/MMX

2025-02-12 Thread Fabian Grünbichler
Package: release.debian.org Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-r...@lists.debian.org, sylves...@debian.org, d...@debian.org Hi! This is prompted by #1095862 (RC-bug on LLVM/rustc for unsoundness/miscompilations on current Debian i386, because LLVM and thus rustc don't support Debian's i386

Processed: block 1094897 with 1094896 1094895 1094894

2025-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1094897 with 1094896 1094895 1094894 Bug #1094897 [release.debian.org] transition: insighttoolkit5 1094897 was not blocked by any bugs. 1094897 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1094897: 1094895, 1094894, and 1094896 > than

Bug#1094991: bookworm-pu: package dcmtk/3.6.7-9~deb12u2

2025-02-12 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Adrian, Adrian Bunk, on 2025-02-13: > The non-ABI-breaking variant is not pretty since instead of > stack.top()->isElement() > it is now doing > dynamic_cast(stack.top()) != nullptr > in many places. Ouch, I opened #1095854 and only saw your proposal after that. I put the bookworm-pu updat

Bug#1095854: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1095854: bookworm-pu: package dcmtk/3.6.7-9~deb12u3

2025-02-12 Thread Étienne Mollier
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hold on, I'm told that this hunk introduces an ABI breakage: > +--- dcmtk.orig/dcmdata/include/dcmtk/dcmdata/dcelem.h > dcmtk/dcmdata/include/dcmtk/dcmdata/dcelem.h > +@@ -143,6 +143,11 @@ > + */ > + virtual OFBool isLeaf() const { return OFTrue; } > + > ++

Processed: Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1095854: bookworm-pu: package dcmtk/3.6.7-9~deb12u3

2025-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #1095854 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package dcmtk/3.6.7-9~deb12u3 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 1095854: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095854 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1095854: bookworm-pu: package dcmtk/3.6.7-9~deb12u3

2025-02-12 Thread Étienne Mollier
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bookworm X-Debbugs-Cc: dc...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:dcmtk User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Good day, [ Reason ] This update follows up on dcmtk/3.6.7-9~deb12u2 to include the missing fix for CVE-202

Processed: bookworm-pu: package dcmtk/3.6.7-9~deb12u3

2025-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:dcmtk Bug #1095854 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package dcmtk/3.6.7-9~deb12u3 Added indication that 1095854 affects src:dcmtk -- 1095854: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095854 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.d

Bug#1094991: bookworm-pu: package dcmtk/3.6.7-9~deb12u2

2025-02-12 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 11:32:12AM +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote: >... > CVE-2024-28130 is notably /not/ fixed for now as I'm not that > comfortable with the codebase and changes were a bit involved. > I note that there has been a port of the fix for Debian LTS > bullseye, so I believe this should b

Bug#1094991: bookworm-pu: package dcmtk/3.6.7-9~deb12u2

2025-02-12 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 09:23:45PM +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote: >... > For the sake of transparency, we received today the bug #1095072 > against dcmtk in bullseye, but I have taken the time to make > sure that the version on its way to the archive was not > affected. >... FTR, both the CVE fix t

Bug#1094991: bookworm-pu: package dcmtk/3.6.7-9~deb12u2

2025-02-12 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Adrian, Adrian Bunk, on 2025-02-12: > FTR, both the CVE fix that caused the regression and the regression fix > are already included in the 3.6.7 upstream version in bookworm. Thank you, this is additional reassurance for the upcoming bookworm-pu request for dcmtk/3.6.7-9~deb12u3 including th

Bug#1095266: transition: dcmtk

2025-02-12 Thread Étienne Mollier
Control: severity 1094895 serious Étienne Mollier, on 2025-02-12: > I checked camitk for instance, and > apparently this is no regression but already a problem in sid. Given my build logs, this is actually #1094895, setting its severity accordinly now that itk5.4 moved to unstable. Have a good n

Bug#1095266: transition: dcmtk

2025-02-12 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Mathieu, Mathieu Malaterre, on 2025-02-12: > On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 12:52 PM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: > > What about its rdeps? Do they build against the new version? > > Étienne would you be able to do your magic to mass-rebuild the rdeps ? > Thank you very much ! I can't really tel

Bug#1082237: transition: numpy 2

2025-02-12 Thread Graham Inggs
It seems someone already tagged all the bugs [1], thanks! [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org&tag=numpy2

Bug#1095779: transition: simdjson

2025-02-12 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 11/02/2025 23:57, M. Zhou wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: simdj...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:simdjson User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi release team, The new upstream release

Processed: Re: Bug#1095779: transition: simdjson

2025-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1095779 [release.debian.org] transition: simdjson Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1095779: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095779 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems