Hi ppc64el porters, Sean,
@porters, can you please have a look at the ppc64el autopkgtest
regressions caused by sbcl [1]?
On 12/2/24 03:36, Sean Whitton wrote:
I don't think I can do anything about this bug. Upstream aren't able to
reproduce it. I don't think it makes sense to block sbcl's
Hello Release Team,
I don't think I can do anything about this bug. Upstream aren't able to
reproduce it. I don't think it makes sense to block sbcl's migration on
this. I think that either we should ignore the cl-ironclad test failure
on ppc64el or remove sbcl on that architecture, if you thin
Your message dated Sun, 1 Dec 2024 23:42:33 +0100
with message-id <65c2a95d-0192-4e94-9565-fa388e02c...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1060103: New of imagemagick7
has caused the Debian Bug report #1060103,
regarding transition: imagemagick7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 27/11/2024 14:14, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
No need to, and thanks for looking at them. Let's go ahead after imagemagick
migrates (which is very close), or if that doesn't happen, I'll see if we can do
this in parallel.
imagemagick migrated. Let's go ahead wi
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1074180 [release.debian.org] transition: php8.4
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1074180: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1074180
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: important
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: proftpd-d...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:proftpd-dfsg
[ Reason ]
The version currently in Debian stable suffers from a
security issues rated quit
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:proftpd-dfsg
Bug #1088843 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
proftpd-dfsg/1.3.8+dfsg-4+deb12u4
Added indication that 1088843 affects src:proftpd-dfsg
--
1088843: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1088843
Debian Bug Tracking
Your message dated Sun, 1 Dec 2024 22:31:01 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1088820: RM: koko/23.08.5+ds.1-2+b1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1088820,
regarding RM: koko/23.08.5+ds.1-2+b1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Your message dated Sun, 1 Dec 2024 22:30:45 +0100
with message-id <863ecf9c-7b30-4f96-8a1f-bf0de50e5...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1088819: RM: kio-gdrive/22.12.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1088819,
regarding RM: kio-gdrive/22.12.3-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Hi,
these three CVEs are now fixed in buster and bullseye. This means users who
upgrade to bookworm will be vulnerable to those issues again. Can we get a
decision from the release team on this bug? Is there any information missing to
make a decision?
Kind regards,
Lee
On Wed, 28 Aug 2024
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 01/12/2024 16:46, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: libfm...@packages.debian.org, team+l...@tracker.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:libfm-qt
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1088797 [release.debian.org] transition: libfm-qt
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1088797: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1088797
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:koko
Bug #1088820 [release.debian.org] RM: koko/23.08.5+ds.1-2+b1
Added indication that 1088820 affects src:koko
--
1088820: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1088820
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pro
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: k...@packages.debian.org, Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers
Control: affects -1 + src:koko
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Dear Release Team,
could you please remove the Qt5 based koko from testing as this will
simplif
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:kio-gdrive
Bug #1088819 [release.debian.org] RM: kio-gdrive/22.12.3-1
Added indication that 1088819 affects src:kio-gdrive
--
1088819: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1088819
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.or
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: kio-gdr...@packages.debian.org, Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers
Control: affects -1 + src:kio-gdrive
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Dear Release Team,
could you please remove the Qt5 based kio-gdrive from testing as
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:libfm-qt
Bug #1088797 [release.debian.org] transition: libfm-qt
Added indication that 1088797 affects src:libfm-qt
--
1088797: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1088797
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with p
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: libfm...@packages.debian.org, team+l...@tracker.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:libfm-qt
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
We request to have transition for libfm-qt for Qt6. All affected
packages
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-systemd-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Release Team,
We would like to upload the latest stable point release of systemd 252
to bookworm-p-u. Stable rel
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi MIchael
On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 at 17:54, Michael R. Crusoe wrote:
> I would like a transition slot for Bioconductor 3.20.
>
> We only need one new package, r-bioc-assorthead, and it is in the NEW queue.
> We are also still waiting on the removal of two r-bioc binary
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #1088701 [release.debian.org] transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics
(r-api-bioc-3.20)
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1088701: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1088701
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with proble
Hi Michael
On Sat, 30 Nov 2024 at 21:25, Michael R. Crusoe wrote:
> While preparing uploads of the BioConductor 3.20 r-bioc-* packages to the
> experimental distribution, I accidentally uploaded a newer version of
> r-bioc-biocstyle (2.34.0+dfsg-1) to unstable.
>
> Shall I fix this by rolling b
22 matches
Mail list logo
