On Tue, Aug 20, 2024, at 13:28, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> Please go ahead.
Uploaded, Thank you!
> I was going to ask if we were affected by the issue mentioned in
> https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/08/16/3 , but then I
> read the upstream issue and s
On Tue, Aug 20, 2024, at 13:28, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> Please go ahead.
Uploaded, thank you!
--
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 2024-08-19 at 16:59 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Note: I've unarchived this bug and proposed a trivial patch:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024730
>
> Hopefully there will be another release.debian.org request
> soon for net-tools to complement this one.
OK, tha
Hi,
On 2024-08-20 11:08, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 at 16:54:01 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > from the point of view of continued development of testing/unstable,
> > I would have hoped that packages in testing/unstable could safely
> > assume that they will run on at least the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> merge 1079116 1079115
Bug #1079116 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
symfony/4.4.19+dfsg-2+deb11u6
Bug #1079115 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
symfony/4.4.19+dfsg-2+deb11u6
Merged 1079115 1079116
> thanks
Stopping processing h
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #1079140 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
intel-microcode/3.20240813.1~deb12u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1079140: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1079140
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #1079141 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
intel-microcode/3.20240813.1~deb11u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1079141: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1079141
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Tue, 2024-08-20 at 09:57 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> As requested by the security team, I would like to bring the
> microcode update level for Intel processors in Bullseye and Bookworm
> to match what we have in Sid and Trixie. This is the bug repor
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Tue, 2024-08-20 at 10:00 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> As requested by the security team, I would like to bring the
> microcode update level for Intel processors in Bullseye and Bookworm
> to match what we have in Sid and Trixie.
Please go ahead.
Reg
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:r-bioc-graph
Bug #1079156 [ftp.debian.org] RM: r-bioc-graph [armel armhf i386] -- ROM;
Upstream no longer supports 32-bit systems
Added indication that 1079156 affects src:r-bioc-graph
> block -1 by 1078966
Bug #1079156 [ftp.debian.org] RM: r-bioc-g
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:r-bioc-limma
Bug #1079155 [ftp.debian.org] RM: r-bioc-limma [armel armhf i386] -- ROM;
Upstream no longer supports 32-bit systems
Added indication that 1079155 affects src:r-bioc-limma
> block -1 by 1079146
Bug #1079155 [ftp.debian.org] RM: r-bioc-l
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 1076843 by 1079137
Bug #1076843 [release.debian.org] transition: r-bioc-biocgenerics
(r-api-bioc-3.19)
1076843 was blocked by: 1078806 1078807 1078831 1078832 1078833 1078834 1078923
1078954 1078955 1078961 1078962 1078963 1078964 1078965
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:r-bioc-lpsymphony
Bug #1079154 [ftp.debian.org] RM: r-bioc-lpsymphony [armel armhf i386] -- ROM;
Upstream no longer supports 32-bit systems
Added indication that 1079154 affects src:r-bioc-lpsymphony
> block 1076843 by -1
Bug #1076843 [release.debia
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:r-bioc-metapod
Bug #1079151 [ftp.debian.org] RM: r-bioc-metapod [armel armhf i386] -- ROM;
Upstream no longer supports 32-bit systems
Added indication that 1079151 affects src:r-bioc-metapod
> block -1 by 1078961
Bug #1079151 [ftp.debian.org] RM: r-
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:r-bioc-rhdf5lib
Bug #1079149 [ftp.debian.org] RM: r-bioc-rhdf5lib [armel armhf i386] -- ROM;
Upstream no longer supports 32-bit systems
Added indication that 1079149 affects src:r-bioc-rhdf5lib
> block -1 by 1078962
Bug #1079149 [ftp.debian.org] RM:
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:r-bioc-affyio
Bug #1079148 [ftp.debian.org] RM: r-bioc-affyio [armel armhf i386] -- ROM;
Upstream no longer supports 32-bit systems
Added indication that 1079148 affects src:r-bioc-affyio
> block -1 by 1078967
Bug #1079148 [ftp.debian.org] RM: r-bio
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:r-bioc-biocneighbors
Bug #1079147 [ftp.debian.org] RM: r-bioc-biocneighbors [armel armhf i386] --
ROM; Upstream no longer supports 32-bit systems
Added indication that 1079147 affects src:r-bioc-biocneighbors
> block -1 by 1079057
Bug #1079147 [ftp.
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:r-bioc-edger
Bug #1079146 [ftp.debian.org] RM: r-bioc-edger [armel armhf i386] -- ROM;
Upstream no longer supports 32-bit systems
Added indication that 1079146 affects src:r-bioc-edger
> block -1 by 1078962
Bug #1079146 [ftp.debian.org] RM: r-bioc-e
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:r-bioc-iranges
Bug #1079145 [ftp.debian.org] RM: r-bioc-iranges [armel armhf i386] -- ROM;
Upstream no longer supports 32-bit systems
Added indication that 1079145 affects src:r-bioc-iranges
> block -1 by 1079127
Bug #1079145 [ftp.debian.org] RM: r-
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:gettext.js
Bug #1079144 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
gettext.js/0.7.0-2+deb11u1
Added indication that 1079144 affects src:gettext.js
--
1079144: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1079144
Debian Bug Tracking System
Cont
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:gettext.js
Bug #1079143 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
gettext.js/0.7.0-3+deb12u1
Added indication that 1079143 affects src:gettext.js
--
1079143: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1079143
Debian Bug Tracking System
Cont
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
[ Reason ]
As requested by the security team, I would like to bring the microcode
update level for Intel processors in Bullseye and Bookworm to match what
we have in Sid and Trixi
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
[ Reason ]
As requested by the security team, I would like to bring the microcode
update level for Intel processors in Bullseye and Bookworm to match what
we have in Sid and Trixi
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:r-bioc-pcamethods
Bug #1079136 [ftp.debian.org] RM: r-bioc-pcamethods [armel armhf i386] -- ROM;
Upstream no longer supports 32-bit systems
Added indication that 1079136 affects src:r-bioc-pcamethods
> block -1 by 1078954
Bug #1079136 [ftp.debian.or
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:r-bioc-rhdf5filters
Bug #1079135 [ftp.debian.org] RM: r-bioc-rhdf5filters [armel armhf i386] --
ROM; Upstream no longer supports 32-bit systems
Added indication that 1079135 affects src:r-bioc-rhdf5filters
> block -1 by 1079063
Bug #1079135 [ftp.deb
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:r-bioc-rhdf5
Bug #1079131 [ftp.debian.org] RM: r-bioc-rhdf5 [armel armhf i386] -- ROM;
Upstream no longer supports 32-bit systems
Added indication that 1079131 affects src:r-bioc-rhdf5
> block -1 by 1078962
Bug #1079131 [ftp.debian.org] RM: r-bioc-r
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:r-bioc-s4arrays
Bug #1079129 [ftp.debian.org] RM: r-bioc-s4arrays [armel armhf i386] -- ROM;
Upstream no longer supports 32-bit systems
Added indication that 1079129 affects src:r-bioc-s4arrays
> block -1 by 1079121
Bug #1079129 [ftp.debian.org] RM:
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:r-bioc-xvector
Bug #1079128 [ftp.debian.org] RM: r-bioc-xvector [armel armhf i386] -- ROM;
Upstream no longer supports 32-bit systems
Added indication that 1079128 affects src:r-bioc-xvector
> block -1 by 1079127
Bug #1079128 [ftp.debian.org] RM: r-
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:r-bioc-biostrings
Bug #1079127 [ftp.debian.org] RM: r-bioc-biostrings [armel armhf i386] -- ROM;
Upstream no longer supports 32-bit systems
Added indication that 1079127 affects src:r-bioc-biostrings
> block -1 by 1078972
Bug #1079127 [ftp.debian.or
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 1079062
Bug #1079126 [ftp.debian.org] RM: r-bioc-genomicranges [armel armhf i386] --
ROM; Upstream no longer supports 32-bit systems
1079126 was not blocked by any bugs.
1079126 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1079126: 1079062
> block
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:r-bioc-sparsearray
Bug #1079122 [ftp.debian.org] RM: r-bioc-sparsearray [armel armhf i386] -- ROM;
Upstream no longer supports 32-bit systems
Added indication that 1079122 affects src:r-bioc-sparsearray
> block -1 by 1079117
Bug #1079122 [ftp.debian
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:r-bioc-delayedarray
Bug #1079121 [ftp.debian.org] RM: r-bioc-delayedarray [armel armhf i386] --
ROM; Upstream no longer supports 32-bit systems
Added indication that 1079121 affects src:r-bioc-delayedarray
> block -1 by 1079117
Bug #1079121 [ftp.deb
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:r-bioc-beachmat
Bug #1079117 [ftp.debian.org] RM: r-bioc-beachmat [armel armhf i386] -- ROM;
Upstream no longer supports 32-bit systems
Added indication that 1079117 affects src:r-bioc-beachmat
> block -1 by 1079060
Bug #1079117 [ftp.debian.org] RM:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
X-Debbugs-Cc: symf...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:symfony
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
I just uploaded symfony 4.4.19+dfsg-2+deb11u6 in order to fix an FTBFS
in symfony (#1078843), but a
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:symfony
Bug #1079116 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
symfony/4.4.19+dfsg-2+deb11u6
Added indication that 1079116 affects src:symfony
--
1079116: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1079116
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:symfony
Bug #1079115 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
symfony/4.4.19+dfsg-2+deb11u6
Added indication that 1079115 affects src:symfony
--
1079115: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1079115
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
X-Debbugs-Cc: symf...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:symfony
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
This fixes an issue introduced in the latest update, that causes several
packages to FTBFS, hence the pr
On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 at 16:54:01 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> from the point of view of continued development of testing/unstable,
> I would have hoped that packages in testing/unstable could safely
> assume that they will run on at least the kernel from stable (or maybe
> oldstable for a short ti
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-m...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-m...@lists.debian.org (was s...@debian.org).
> usertags 1050872 + mips64el
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: mips64el.
> tags 1050872 + security
Bug #1050872 [release.debian.org]
Your message dated Tue, 20 Aug 2024 09:37:53 +0200
with message-id <4ef64c8c-e8e4-4e02-a2ab-4484ea4df...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1073983: transition: ocaml
has caused the Debian Bug report #1073983,
regarding transition: ocaml
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:21:20 +0200 Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
> On 2024-08-19 12:29:24 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Aug 19, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> >
> > > Reserve dependencies failing with unresolved symbols is a sign that
> > > libkmod is missing a SONAME bump. Why hasn't that been do
Le mardi 20 août 2024, 07:11:13 UTC Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
> On 28/07/2024 20:56, Bastien Roucariès wrote:
> > control: tags -1 - moreinfo
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Last reverse deps of lib magick pipeline is not really bad
> > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/imagemagick/-/pipelines/708187
>
On 28/07/2024 20:56, Bastien Roucariès wrote:
control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi,
Last reverse deps of lib magick pipeline is not really bad
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/imagemagick/-/pipelines/708187
A lot of failure are due to broken package or does not use pkgconfig
I suppose we could go to
On 19/08/2024 18:23, Yavor Doganov wrote:
GCC 14 promoted certain warnings to errors but these do not affect
Objective-C packages. The GNU Objective-C compiler does not define
__STDC_VERSION__ meaning that the C standard in effect is gnu89:
-Wimplicit-function-declaration [1], -Wincompatible-poi
44 matches
Mail list logo
