Bug#1075938: marked as done (transition: glibc 2.39)

Your message dated Tue, 23 Jul 2024 15:32:09 +0900 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1075938: transition: glibc 2.39 has caused the Debian Bug report #1075938, regarding transition: glibc 2.39 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Re: Coordingating/planning various golang transitions

On Jul 23, 2024 12:28 PM, Mathias Gibbens wrote: > > Are there any objections to starting the process of uploading > packages to unstable, following the outline that Reinhard provided > (quoted at the end of the message)? I'm here at DebCamp and would be > happy to start working thro

Re: Coordingating/planning various golang transitions

Are there any objections to starting the process of uploading packages to unstable, following the outline that Reinhard provided (quoted at the end of the message)? I'm here at DebCamp and would be happy to start working through the uploads and any other hand-holding to get the migration underway

Bug#1072248: runc 1.0.0~rc93+ds1-5+deb11u4 flagged for acceptance

Am Dienstag, dem 23.07.2024 um 01:12 +0200 schrieb Daniel Leidert: > Hi Jonathan, > > Am Montag, dem 01.07.2024 um 18:49 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire: > > > [..] > > Please don't change history, and send a debdiff (relative to u4) of a > > proposed upload fixing the regressions as 1.0.0~rc93

Bug#1072248: runc 1.0.0~rc93+ds1-5+deb11u4 flagged for acceptance

Hi Jonathan, Am Montag, dem 01.07.2024 um 18:49 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire: [..] > Please don't change history, and send a debdiff (relative to u4) of a > proposed upload fixing the regressions as 1.0.0~rc93+ds1-5+deb11u5 and a > proper changelog. Do not upload without further approval. P

Bug#1073983: transition: ocaml

Hi Paul, Le 21/07/2024 à 08:18, Paul Gevers a écrit : I've scheduled tests of all OCaml packages that provide tests (there are 86 of them). I did not specify any priority, I hope that's fine. That's fine for now. I guess you submitted via pasting the json you created in the self-service. In

Bug#1066965: bookworm-pu: package newlib/3.3.0-2

I finally was able to make room for a newlib build, and as uploaded the fix a few minutes ago. Included is the final diff. I dropped the switch to the QA team, as this package is not maintained by the gcc group in unstable, and went with the more traditional version number scheme. diff --git a