Re: Is it possible to use ben offline?

2024-05-15 Thread Charles Plessy
> On 5/14/24 2:17 AM, Charles Plessy wrote: > > I see that ben has a --mirror option. But will it work if the "mirror" > > is a local archive containing only Bioconductor packages? Le Tue, May 14, 2024 at 05:24:39AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg a écrit : > > `ben tracker` should work offline ass

Uploading linux (6.8.9-1)

2024-05-15 Thread Ben Hutchings
I intend to upload linux 6.8.9-1 to unstable tomorrow (Thursday 16th May). This is a new upstream version with, as usual, many changes. The pending changes in the package are: * d/templates/main.control.in: Add python3-dacite as linux-support Depends * [armhf] Improve Tegra Chromebook suppor

Bug#1061188: transition: python3-defaults (making python3.12 the default python3 version)

2024-05-15 Thread Matthias Klose
On 15.05.24 11:14, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Hi Matthias, On 20/01/2024 15:41, Matthias Klose wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Please setup a tracker for the python3-defaults transition, making 3.12 the d

Processed: Re: Bug#1071121: transition: clamav

2024-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #1071121 [release.debian.org] transition: clamav Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 1071121: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071121 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1071121: transition: clamav

2024-05-15 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 14/05/2024 19:49, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: Package: release.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:clamav X-Debbugs-Cc: cla...@packages.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Severity: normal ClamAV 1.3.x has a new soname.

Bug#1071161: bullseye-pu: package glib2.0/2.66.8-1+deb11u4

2024-05-15 Thread Simon McVittie
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: glib...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:glib2.0 [ Reason ] Fix a minor memory leak introduced by recent security updates, matching a similar request for

Processed: bullseye-pu: package glib2.0/2.66.8-1+deb11u4

2024-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:glib2.0 Bug #1071161 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package glib2.0/2.66.8-1+deb11u4 Added indication that 1071161 affects src:glib2.0 -- 1071161: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071161 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...

Bug#1071159: bookworm-pu: package glib2.0/2.74.6-2+deb12u3

2024-05-15 Thread Simon McVittie
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bookworm User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: glib...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:glib2.0 [ Reason ] Fix a minor memory leak introduced by recent security updates. [ Impact ] In an unusual situ

Processed: bookworm-pu: package glib2.0/2.74.6-2+deb12u3

2024-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:glib2.0 Bug #1071159 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package glib2.0/2.74.6-2+deb12u3 Added indication that 1071159 affects src:glib2.0 -- 1071159: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071159 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...

Requesting for adding the loong64 port to arch_qualify page

2024-05-15 Thread zhangdandan
Hi, I request for adding the loong64 port to arch_qualify page (https://release.debian.org/testing/arch_qualify.html). Could you add loong64 to the architecture table in arch_qualify page? I will improve the port until it completely satisfies the criteria for being included in a Debian release

Bug#1061188: transition: python3-defaults (making python3.12 the default python3 version)

2024-05-15 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Hi Matthias, On 20/01/2024 15:41, Matthias Klose wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Please setup a tracker for the python3-defaults transition, making 3.12 the default Python version. What's the current status

Bug#1067064: transition: petsc hypre

2024-05-15 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2024-05-15 10:00, Drew Parsons wrote: On 2024-05-15 09:20, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: While looking at the tracker, I noticed that petsc is still building manual -dbg packages. IS there a reason that those have not been converted to automatic -dbgsym packages? No, it's not about symbols. -

Bug#1067064: transition: petsc hypre

2024-05-15 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2024-05-15 09:20, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: Control: tags -1 confirmed The petsc patch for the 64-bit time_t transition was deeply invasive. It makes petsc (and slepc) essentially unmaintainable. I think the best way to deal with it is to pretend it never happened and move on with petsc 3.2

Processed: Re: Bug#1067064: transition: petsc hypre

2024-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1067064 [release.debian.org] transition: petsc hypre Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1067064: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067064 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1067064: transition: petsc hypre

2024-05-15 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi On 2024-03-17 22:52:51 +0100, Drew Parsons wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: pe...@packages.debian.org, francesco.balla...@unicatt.it > Control: affects -1 + src:petsc > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: tr

Bug#1055755: marked as done (transition: libre/rem/baresip)

2024-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 May 2024 09:16:20 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1055755: transition: libre/rem/baresip has caused the Debian Bug report #1055755, regarding transition: libre/rem/baresip to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Bug#1062666: marked as done (transition: openmm)

2024-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 May 2024 09:15:07 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1062666: transition: openmm has caused the Debian Bug report #1062666, regarding transition: openmm to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the