Processing changes file: python-dnslib_0.9.14-1+deb11u1_all-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: python-dnslib_0.9.14-1+deb11u1_source.changes
ACCEPT
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 02:02:29AM +0530, Praveen Arimbrathodiyil wrote:
> [ Reason ]
> #1064411 some files that are present in npm dist tarball was missing in the
> binary package (it was built but not included in the binary) shipped in
> debian. We noticed this only now
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #1064419 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
node-neo-async/2.6.2+~cs3.0.0-2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1064419: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064419
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with prob
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> tags 1063821 = bullseye pending
Bug #1063821 [release.debian.org] bullseye-p
package release.debian.org
tags 1063821 = bullseye pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bullseye.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: python-dnslib
Version: 0.9.1
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #1064031 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
rustc-web/1.70.0+dfsg1-7~deb12u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1064031: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064031
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Thu, 2024-02-15 at 19:25 -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> Chromium now requires a Rust compiler to build, and it specifically
> needs a rustc with profiler support built into it. This package can
> hopefully be shared with firefox and other browser/web engines that
Hi Paul,
Thanks very much for your reply.
For what it's worth, I don't necessarily need britney2 to handle these
migrations "correctly", and I don't think Debian does either. However,
there is some behavior instability when arch-indep and arch-dep packages
are proposed in different ways in the sa
9 matches
Mail list logo