Державна служба України з надзвичайних ситуацій

2024-01-21 Thread Стасюк Векла Бажанівна
Державна служба України з надзвичайних ситуацій 01601, Україна, Київ, вулиця Володимирська, 13 Адресат: %E-mail_адрес% Державна служба України з надзвичайних ситуацій Надсилає Вам посилання на завантаження електронного плану евакуації мешканців, наразі ворожим авіаударом уражено 1 блок Хме

Re: chromium and rustc in bookworm

2024-01-21 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 06:55:31PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: >... > b) Backport the profiler patch to bookworm's rustc, and do a s-p-u update to > Bookworm's rustc. Since this adds a new feature, I don't view it as too > risky, but the release team or rust team may feel differently. The main > d

Re: Bug#1060188: transition: flatbuffers

2024-01-21 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 06:58:37PM -0500, Mo Zhou wrote: > > On 1/21/24 10:54, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > Should those that are not part of the transition tracker use the shared > > library or not? > flatbuffers is like protobuf. I'm not sure how many rdeps among

chromium and rustc in bookworm

2024-01-21 Thread Andres Salomon
Hi, Soon, Chromium 121.x will be released with a hard requirement on a Rust compiler. Upstream ships a bundled rustc by default, which is undesirable for numerous reasons (least of which, it balloons the orig.tar.xz to 3GB!). I've gotten chromium 120 to build with Debian's rustc packages in

Re: Bug#1060188: transition: flatbuffers

2024-01-21 Thread Mo Zhou
On 1/21/24 10:54, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: Control: tags -1 confirmed Should those that are not part of the transition tracker use the shared library or not? flatbuffers is like protobuf. I'm not sure how many rdeps among the list links against it statically.

Processed: transition: unixcw

2024-01-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:unixcw Bug #1061267 [release.debian.org] transition: unixcw Added indication that 1061267 affects src:unixcw -- 1061267: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061267 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problem

Bug#1061267: transition: unixcw

2024-01-21 Thread tony mancill
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: uni...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:unixcw Dear Release Team, I am requesting a transition for unixcw [1]. The one reverse dependency, cwdaemon, builds co

Bug#1054189: bullseye-pu: package debian-security-support/1:11+2023.10.17

2024-01-21 Thread Holger Levsen
hi! On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 03:23:55PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > In the past this package has been released early via stable-updates; is > that your intention this time, or can it wait until the next point release > expected in February? after having spent a bit too much time thinking a

Bug#1061071: transition: libcamera 0.2.0

2024-01-21 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi Dylan On 2024-01-17 12:33:56 +0100, Dylan Aïssi wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > Control: affects -1 + src:libcamera > > Dear Release Team, > > Please schedule a transiti

Processed: Re: Bug#1061061: transition: astc-encoder

2024-01-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1061061 [release.debian.org] transition: astc-encoder Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1061061: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061061 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1061061: transition: astc-encoder

2024-01-21 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi Timo On 2024-01-17 09:16:19 +0100, Timo Röhling wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-Debbugs-Cc: astc-enco...@packages.debian.org > Control: affects -1 + src:astc-encoder >

Processed: Re: Bug#1061071: transition: libcamera 0.2.0

2024-01-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1061071 [release.debian.org] transition: libcamera 0.2.0 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1061071: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061071 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#1060704: transition: dcmtk

2024-01-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #1060704 [release.debian.org] transition: dcmtk Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 1060704: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060704 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1060704: transition: dcmtk

2024-01-21 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Mathieu On 2024-01-13 11:47:40 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > I'd like to migrate to dcmtk 3.6.8. This is a standard SONAME transition. Are th

Bug#1060188: transition: flatbuffers

2024-01-21 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi On 2024-01-07 01:11:24 -0500, M. Zhou wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-Debbugs-Cc: flatbuff...@packages.debian.org > Control: affects -1 + src:flatbuffers > > The flatbu

Processed: Re: Bug#1060188: transition: flatbuffers

2024-01-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1060188 [release.debian.org] transition: flatbuffers Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1060188: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060188 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1058923: marked as done (transition: g2clib)

2024-01-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2024 16:52:39 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1060077: transition: g2clib has caused the Debian Bug report #1060077, regarding transition: g2clib to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Processed: Re: Bug#1060182: transition: simdjson

2024-01-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1060182 [release.debian.org] transition: simdjson Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1060182: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060182 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1060077: marked as done (transition: g2clib)

2024-01-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2024 16:52:39 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1060077: transition: g2clib has caused the Debian Bug report #1060077, regarding transition: g2clib to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#1060182: transition: simdjson

2024-01-21 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 2024-01-06 18:22:36 -0500, M. Zhou wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-Debbugs-Cc: simdj...@packages.debian.org > Control: affects -1 + src:simdjson > > Hi, > > simdjson up

Processed: Re: Bug#1060058: transition: tpm2-tss

2024-01-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1060058 [release.debian.org] transition: tpm2-tss Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1060058: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060058 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1060058: transition: tpm2-tss

2024-01-21 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi Ying-Chun On 2024-01-05 20:14:15 +0800, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-Debbugs-Cc: tpm2-...@packages.debian.org, paul...@debian.org > Control: a

Bug#1059066: marked as done (transition: nauty)

2024-01-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2024 16:46:42 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1059066: transition: nauty has caused the Debian Bug report #1059066, regarding transition: nauty to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the ca

Bug#1059272: marked as done (transition: tango)

2024-01-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2024 16:46:05 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1059272: transition: tango has caused the Debian Bug report #1059272, regarding transition: tango to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the ca

Bug#1059609: bookworm-pu: package engrampa/1.26.0-1+deb12u1

2024-01-21 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi Adam, On Sa 20 Jan 2024 15:24:35 CET, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Fri, 2023-12-29 at 08:25 +0100, Mike Gabriel wrote: While upload a new upstream version of engrampa, a bookworm-pu has been prepared that fixes various memleaks and resolves a bug in the archive "s

NEW changes in stable-new

2024-01-21 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: engrampa_1.26.0-1+deb12u1_source.changes REJECT

Processed: tagging 1059609

2024-01-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1059609 - moreinfo Bug #1059609 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package engrampa/1.26.0-1+deb12u1 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1059609: https://bugs.debian.org/cg