On Sun, Jan 7, 2024, at 23:07, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi
>
> With Linux 6.6 we dropped the Marvell specific kernel image, as it
> was not known to work on any of the available devices. We still have
> another armel kernel left, the one of the Raspberry Pi 0 and 1, which
> uses an ARMv6 CPU.
>
> Th
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
I've had for a while a new hook for dupload that adds a transitions
check for Debian hosts, for sourceful uploads targeting unstable (to
avoid disrupting buildd or porter uploads, or uninteresting suites).
I've just finished polishing it, and the
On 2024-01-09 19:56, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> though. Any armel users out there? :-)
My employer uses Debian on armel, but not d-i :-)
On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 11:23:36PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2024-01-09 00:08:09 +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 01:15:26PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 08:28:01PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > >
> > > > this has taken me much longer than nec
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 1055955 with 1060323
Bug #1055955 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.38
1055955 was blocked by: 1040396 1057270 1057318 1042525 1042844 1054793 1042845
1057424 1042853 1042521 1050451 1054776
1055955 was not blocking any bugs.
Added bl
Hi Bastian,
On Sun, Jan 07, 2024 at 11:07:48PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Do we have any armel subarch that can be installed via d-i?
Not as far as I know, perhaps Sledge has more info on this? Also, I don't think
we've seen anyone mentioning armel in ages on debian-boot, both in terms of
inst
On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 03:01:11PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 09:17:52PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > On 05-01-2024 17:36, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > Also a problem is that experimental also might already contain totally
> > > unrelated updates like new upstream versio
On Mon, 08 Jan 2024 at 15:01:11 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> If a maintainer ignores the NMU and drops the rename, they'll be introducing
> a new library transition again on 32-bit archs. Won't they also be caught
> again in binary NEW, for those packages that don't have the same runtime
> libra
8 matches
Mail list logo
