Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2023 07:38:49 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1052324: nmu: glom_1.30.4-7+b3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052324,
regarding nmu: glom_1.30.4-7+b3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
The attached debdiff for cups fixes CVE-2023-4504 and CVE-2023-32360 in
Bullseye. These CVEs have been marked as no-dsa by the security team, but
at least CVE-2023-32360 got an
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
The attached debdiff for cups fixes CVE-2023-4504 and CVE-2023-32360 in
Bookworm. These CVEs have been marked as no-dsa by the security team,
but at least CVE-2023-32360 got an
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
On 20-09-2023 21:55, Mateusz Łukasik wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Dear release team, I would like to request the removal of the openbox-menu
package (which I maintain) from repository.
This is handled by the ftp masters, hence reassigning. (We only han
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Bug #1052357 [release.debian.org] RM: openbox-menu/0.8.0+hg20161009-3.1
Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1052357 to the same values
previously set
Ignori
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User:release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
X-Debbugs-Cc: openbox-m...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:openbox-menu
Dear release team, I would like to request the removal of the openbox-menu
package (which I maintain) from re
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:openbox-menu
Bug #1052357 [release.debian.org] RM: openbox-menu/0.8.0+hg20161009-3.1
Added indication that 1052357 affects src:openbox-menu
--
1052357: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1052357
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow.
Your message dated Wed, 20 Sep 2023 14:29:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Will be in upcoming security release
has caused the Debian Bug report #1049325,
regarding bullseye-pu: netatalk/3.1.12~ds-8+deb11u1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian.org at packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-systemd-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Release Team,
We would like to upload the latest stable point release of systemd 252
to bookworm-p-u. Stable
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:glom
Bug #1052324 [release.debian.org] nmu: glom_1.30.4-7+b3
Added indication that 1052324 affects src:glom
--
1052324: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1052324
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: g...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:glom
Please binnmu glom:
nmu glom_1.30.4-7+b3 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against postgresql-16."
Thanks,
Christoph
Control: tags -1 = confirmed
On 2023-09-20 09:12:43 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Dear Sebastian,
>
> Le 20/09/2023 à 08:48, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit :
> > > I recompiled the OCaml world with it:
> > >
> > >http://ocaml.debian.net/transitions/ocaml-4.14.1/
> >
> > Based on https://relea
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 = confirmed
Bug #1052239 [release.debian.org] transition: ocaml
Added tag(s) confirmed; removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1052239: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1052239
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Wed, 20 Sep 2023 07:41:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1050223: RM: r-cran-rgdal/1.6-7+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1050223,
regarding RM: r-cran-rgdal/1.6-7+dfsg-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Le 20/09/2023 à 09:27, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit :
Based on https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ocaml.html,
diffoscope is involved in both the ocaml and the uncoordinated haskell
transitions. Do we need rebuilds of diffoscope for ocaml?
Why does it matter?
If we would need them, diff
On 2023-09-20 09:12:43 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Dear Sebastian,
>
> Le 20/09/2023 à 08:48, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit :
> > > I recompiled the OCaml world with it:
> > >
> > >http://ocaml.debian.net/transitions/ocaml-4.14.1/
> >
> > Based on https://release.debian.org/transitions/html
Dear Sebastian,
Le 20/09/2023 à 08:48, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit :
I recompiled the OCaml world with it:
http://ocaml.debian.net/transitions/ocaml-4.14.1/
Based on https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ocaml.html,
diffoscope is involved in both the ocaml and the uncoordinated haskel
17 matches
Mail list logo
