Hi,
Am 27.06.23 um 00:15 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
On 2023-06-18 13:57:01 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
hunspell-dict-ko was fixed/worked around the issue (0.7.94-1) so we can do
this now.
As said it's a no-op for anything except r-cran-hunspell which also is
prepared in experimental tog
Dear release team, please skip to the bottom for the info you're looking
for.
Salvatore Bonaccorso writes:
> What is as well different for the uploads is to which upload queue you
> would upload in the end. ftp-master for the proposed-updates via point
> release, security-master for the security
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 -moreinfo
Bug #1039484 [release.debian.org] transition: gpsd
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1039484: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039484
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
Hi,
On Tue, 2023-06-27 at 00:13 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> On 2023-06-26 13:24:57 +, Boian Bonev wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transit
Control: tags -1 = confirmed
On 2023-06-18 13:57:01 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> hunspell-dict-ko was fixed/worked around the issue (0.7.94-1) so we can do
> this now.
>
> As said it's a no-op for anything except r-cran-hunspell which also is
> prepared in experimental together with hu
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 = confirmed
Bug #1028132 [release.debian.org] transition: hunspell
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1028132: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028132
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jun 2023 00:12:26 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1039052: nmu: tclodbc_2.5.1-2+b1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1039052,
regarding nmu: tclodbc_2.5.1-2+b1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jun 2023 00:11:35 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1039494: nmu: libarcus_5.0.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1039494,
regarding nmu: libarcus_5.0.0-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2023-06-26 13:24:57 +, Boian Bonev wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc: g...@packages.debian.org, b...@debian.org
> Control: affects -1 + src:gpsd
>
> New vers
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #1039106 [release.debian.org] transition: tinygltf
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1039106: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039106
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #1039484 [release.debian.org] transition: gpsd
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1039484: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039484
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2023-06-25 20:19:38 +0200, Timo Röhling wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc: tinyg...@packages.debian.org
> Control: affects -1 + src:tinygltf
>
> Dear release tea
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #1039104 [release.debian.org] transition: draco
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1039104: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039104
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2023-06-25 20:05:18 +0200, Timo Röhling wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc: dr...@packages.debian.org
> Control: affects -1 + src:draco
>
> Dear release team,
>
On Monday, June 26, 2023 3:26:19 PM EDT Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Control: tag -1 confirmed
>
> On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 01:44:43PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > This is a new upstream release that we targetted to address bugs that
> > would generally be suitable for Debian post-release updat
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1038879 - moreinfo
Bug #1038879 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
proftpd-dfsg/1.3.8+dfsg-4+deb12u1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1038879: https://bugs.debi
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #1035046 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package lacme/0.8.0-2+deb11u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1035046: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035046
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 10:58:04AM +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> The ACME specification (RFC 8555 sec. 7.1.6) clearly reads that state
> transition for Order Objects follows (‘pending’ →) ‘ready’ →
> ‘processing’ → ‘valid’, but lacme 0.8.0-2 fails to handle the transitio
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #1039040 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: cups/2.3.3op2-3+deb11u3
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1039040: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039040
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 09:40:34PM +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> The attached debdiff for cups fixes CVE-2023-32324 and CVE-2023-34241 in
> Bullseye. Both CVE have been marked as no-dsa by the security team.
>
> The same fixes have been already uploaded to Unstable a
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #1037188 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package git/2.30.2-1+deb11u3
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1037188: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1037188
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 01:22:25PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> [ Reason ]
> git-el in bullseye is uninstallable in any sensible combination with
> emacs/xemacs (it only installs fine in a minimal chroot w/o
> --install-recommends).
> The package was dropped from sid
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #1035475 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package dkimpy/1.0.5-1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1035475: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035475
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 01:44:43PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> This is a new upstream release that we targetted to address bugs that
> would generally be suitable for Debian post-release updates.
Please go ahead.
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 07:28:36PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
Updated debdiff attached.
Sorry wrong diff, this is the correct one :-/
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
diff -Nru proftpd-dfsg-1.3.8+dfsg/debian/changelog proftpd-dfsg-1.3.8+dfsg/debian/changelog
--- proftpd-dfsg-1.3.8+dfsg/de
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #1020303 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
modsecurity-apache/2.9.3-3+deb11u2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1020303: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020303
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with p
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 12:58:31PM +0100, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote:
> Hi, all. We're looking forward to uploading the latest CRS package to
> bullseye-backports, but this will require this pending update to
> bullseye. Any news on this front?
Please go ahead.
Than
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:50:05AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
Ok, I did my homework again and found that the best thing to do seems removing
the
proftpd-run.service and enabling the proftpd.service only at
installation time. That would allow proftpd working flawlessly at
least for ne
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 01:23:43PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Hello Sebastian,
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 10:17:07PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > On 2023-04-30 18:43:18 [+0200], Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > > > - the backport package of manpages-de and m
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #1035310 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package xz-utils/5.2.11-0~deb11u1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1035310: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035310
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu libarcus_5.0.0-2 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild with Python 3.11 only"
There may be more packages in experimental having missed that part of
the last python transition.
Andreas
Hi Donald,
On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 06:33 -0400, Donald Norwood wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 6/20/23 13:15, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > The traditional cadence for oldstable point releases is four
> > months,
> > rather than two. That technically means that 11.8 would be due
> > somewhere in late August to mi
Processing changes file: nftables_1.0.6-2+deb12u1_amd64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nftables_1.0.6-2+deb12u1_arm64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nftables_1.0.6-2+deb12u1_armel-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nftables_1.0.6-2+deb12u1_armhf-bui
Processing changes file: request-tracker5_5.0.3+dfsg-3~deb12u1_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> tags 1038344 = bookworm pending
Bug #1038344 [release.debian.org] bookworm-p
package release.debian.org
tags 1038344 = bookworm pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bookworm.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: request-tracker5
Version: 5.
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:gpsd
Bug #1039484 [release.debian.org] transition: gpsd
Added indication that 1039484 affects src:gpsd
--
1039484: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039484
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: g...@packages.debian.org, b...@debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:gpsd
New version of gpsd 3.25 introduces changes in shared libraries API (and of
course ABI)
soname is b
Processing changes file: bind9_9.16.42-1~deb11u1_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: bind9_9.16.42-1~deb11u1_all-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: bind9_9.16.42-1~deb11u1_amd64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: bind9_9.16.42-1~deb11u1_arm64-buildd.changes
Processing changes file: nftables_1.0.6-2+deb12u1_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> tags 1038727 = bookworm pending
Bug #1038727 [release.debian.org] bookworm-p
package release.debian.org
tags 1038727 = bookworm pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bookworm.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: nftables
Version: 1.0.6-2+de
Can help the 1th or 8th July the 15th i am having vacation
2023-06-19 23:02 GMT+02:00, Jonathan Wiltshire :
> Hi,
>
> I'm sending this separately to a similar mail for 12.1. That's because the
> timings are far enough out that they would make sense on separate weekends,
> but they could also be st
Can help the 8th July if help is needed, can't help the other dates
however as i will be busy with vacation and GUADEC then
2023-06-19 23:04 GMT+02:00, Jonathan Wiltshire :
> Hi,
>
> The promised 4-6 weeks following release for 12.1 looks like:
>
> 8th July (4)
> 15th July (5)
> 22nd July (6)
>
>
On Mon, 2023-06-26 at 07:01 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 04:42:27PM +1200, Andrew Ruthven wrote:
> > Changelog updated as requested, and uploaded to bookworm.
>
> You need a tilde in the version, not a plus ("lower than"). I'll reject
> the
> upload, you can upload a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 1025480 with 1039470
Bug #1025480 [libopenblas0-pthread] libopenblas0-pthread: gives wrong results
with AVX-512 kernel
1025480 was not blocked by any bugs.
1025480 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1025480: 1039470
> block
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: openb...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:openblas
Dear Release Team,
[ Reason ]
This oldstable update fixes important bug #1025480.
As a reminder, Ope
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:openblas
Bug #1039470 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
openblas/0.3.13+ds-3+deb11u1
Added indication that 1039470 affects src:openblas
--
1039470: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039470
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contac
Processing changes file: cvs_1.12.13+real-28+deb12u1_amd64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: cvs_1.12.13+real-28+deb12u1_arm64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: cvs_1.12.13+real-28+deb12u1_armel-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: cvs_1.12.13+real-28+deb12
On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 05:27:04PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Maybe I missed something important, but this seems a very odd way of doing
> things. Do you really set up a dummy service unit which is expected to fail
> in standalone mode, and therefore starts the socket instead?
>
> Why not
Le dim. 25 juin 2023 à 21:36, Sebastian Ramacher
a écrit :
>
> > The unique reverse dep (pipewire) builds fine with the
> > new liblc3 in experimental.
>
> Please go ahead.
Thanks, uploaded!
Best regards,
Dylan
Hello,
On 2023-06-25 21:15, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
python-pdbfixer seems to need a sourceful upload due to the
python3-simtk => python3-openmm rename.
Sourceful upload does not seem to help: somewhy python3-pdbfixer picks
dependency on python3-simtk instead of python3-openmm. I guess this
52 matches
Mail list logo
