Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:altos
Bug #1036535 [release.debian.org] unblock: altos/1.9.16-2
Added indication that 1036535 affects src:altos
--
1036535: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036535
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with prob
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: al...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:altos
Please unblock package altos
The altos package is apparently scheduled for autoremoval from testing due
to bug #10360
Hi Luca,
On Mon, 22 May 2023 00:03:46 +0100
Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Sun, 21 May 2023 at 20:31, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 21 May 2023 at 20:29, Christoph Berg
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Re: Luca Boccassi
> > > > If we were to do a MBF against packages that in _Bookworm_ have
> > > > in
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package firefox-esr
[ Reason ]
Security update for Firefox. The same package has already reached
bullseye.
[ Impact ]
See above
[ Tests ]
Usual smoke tests
[ Risks ]
See a
On Sun, 21 May 2023 at 20:31, Luca Boccassi wrote:
>
> On Sun, 21 May 2023 at 20:29, Christoph Berg wrote:
> >
> > Re: Luca Boccassi
> > > If we were to do a MBF against packages that in _Bookworm_ have
> > > introduced new files in /bin, /sbin or /lib*, would you accept the
> > > consequent mass
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: dokuw...@packages.debian.org, a...@debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:dokuwiki
Please unblock package dokuwiki/0.0.20220731.a-2
It fixes a XSS security issue (#1036279) for
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:dokuwiki
Bug #1036524 [release.debian.org] unblock: dokuwiki/0.0.20220731.a-2
Added indication that 1036524 affects src:dokuwiki
--
1036524: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036524
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.deb
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: x...@packages.debian.org, t...@security.debian.org,
m...@daemonizer.de
Control: affects -1 + src:xen
Please unblock package xen.
[ Reason ]
Xen in bookworm is currently affe
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:xen
Bug #1036475 [release.debian.org] unblock: xen/4.17.1+2-gb773c48e36-1
Added indication that 1036475 affects src:xen
--
1036475: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036475
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w
There's one week left until bookworm goes into full freeze, and there's been no
update here so I'm assuming KDE Plasma 5.27.5 won't be unblocked for bookworm
unless a miracle happens, so I wanted to ask, just as an average user who's not
involved at all in Debian packaging -
How possible is it
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Bug #1036354 [release.debian.org] unblock: iptables-persistent/1.0.20
Added tag(s) moreinfo and confirmed.
--
1036354: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036354
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
On 2023-05-20 13:23:09 +, gustavo panizzo wrote:
> >> >> unblock iptables-persistent/1.0.20
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >Thanks for taking care of this - I just checked and cannot see the upload
> >> >to unstable though?
> >>
> >> I'd prefer to wait for an ack from
On Sun, 21 May 2023 at 20:29, Christoph Berg wrote:
>
> Re: Luca Boccassi
> > If we were to do a MBF against packages that in _Bookworm_ have
> > introduced new files in /bin, /sbin or /lib*, would you accept the
> > consequent mass unblock request?
>
> Fwiw, I would restrict that to packages that
On 20.05.2023 10:43, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi Salvatore,
Hilmar mentioned another bugfix possibly to be asked for bookworm,
but I would suggest to discuss this either here as followup or with a
separate unblock request, Hilmar does that work for you?
I was thinking about fixing #103546
Re: Luca Boccassi
> If we were to do a MBF against packages that in _Bookworm_ have
> introduced new files in /bin, /sbin or /lib*, would you accept the
> consequent mass unblock request?
Fwiw, I would restrict that to packages that didn't have files in
these directories before. Telling a maintain
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debian-edu-fai
[ Reason ]
In the context of #1035654, a few source packages (including this one)
still fail to purge remove without adduser installed.
[ Impact ]
W
Hello Release Team,
If we were to do a MBF against packages that in _Bookworm_ have
introduced new files in /bin, /sbin or /lib*, would you accept the
consequent mass unblock request?
I am asking beforehand as there's no point in going through the effort
if you don't, the advantage is only if we c
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package x2gobroker
[ Reason ]
In the context of #1035654, a few source packages (including this one)
still fail to purge remove without adduser installed. It also was
report
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:ros-actionlib
Bug #1036472 [release.debian.org] unblock: ros-actionlib/1.14.0-6
Added indication that 1036472 affects src:ros-actionlib
--
1036472: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036472
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@b
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: ros-action...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:ros-actionlib
Please unblock package ros-actionlib
[ Reason ]
libactionlib-dev was missing a depenency.
[ Impact ]
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal
The package is outdated, and upstream doesn't provide the calibration
files any longer, which leads to an RC bug. The actual version cannot be
packaged due to unresolved licensing issues. Ther
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Control: affects -1 src:palo
This pre-unblock request is to get a decision from the Bookworm
release team if I'm allowed to upload the palo 2.23 bug-fix version.
- palo is a bootloader fo
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 src:palo
Bug #1036459 [release.debian.org] pre-unblock: palo/2.23
Added indication that 1036459 affects src:palo
--
1036459: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036459
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 1036300 bullseye-pu: package curl/7.74.0-1.3+deb11u8
Bug #1036300 [release.debian.org] Fwd: bullseye-pu: package
curl/7.74.0-1.3+deb11u8
Changed Bug title to 'bullseye-pu: package curl/7.74.0-1.3+deb11u8' from 'Fwd:
bullseye-pu: package
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: libfastj...@packages.debian.org, bi...@debian.org
Control: affects -1 + libfastjson
Please unblock package libfastjson
A new upstream version of libfastjson fixes a security b
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + libfastjson
Bug #1036456 [release.debian.org] unblock: libfastjson/1.2304.0-1
Added indication that 1036456 affects libfastjson
--
1036456: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036456
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.o
On Sat, 20 May 2023 13:23:09 + gustavo panizzo
wrote:
> How to do that? I hope is done now
Yes, I believe it is enough to mention it in the thread.
Gentle ping for the release team - would really like to have this
merged for Bookworm, so that we don't have to maintain this setup for
the dur
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
On Sat, 20 May 2023 13:54:14 +0200 Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quoting Sebastian Ramacher (2023-05-20 13:38:20)
> > > some of the packages uploaded to unstable or experimental are
breaking the
> > > mmdebstrap autopkgtest:
> > >
> > > - doc-debi
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 -moreinfo
Bug #1035975 [release.debian.org] [pre-approval] unblock: mmdebstrap/1.3.5-X
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1035975: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035975
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1035710 [release.debian.org] unblock: doc-debian/11.3
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1035710: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035710
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On Sat, 20 May 2023 16:21:47 +0200 Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo cofnirmed
>
> On 2023-05-14 06:47:18 +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > reopen 1035710
> > retitle 1035710 unblock: doc-debian/11.3
> > thanks
> >
> > Please unblock package do
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: libv...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:libvirt
Please unblock package libvirt
[ Reason ]
Fix CVE-2023-2700.
[ Impact ]
Fix CVE-2023-2700.
[ Tests ]
I ha
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:libvirt
Bug #1036453 [release.debian.org] unblock: libvirt/9.0.0-4
Added indication that 1036453 affects src:libvirt
--
1036453: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036453
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Hi all,
Cyril Brulebois (2023-05-06):
> I think it'd make sense to have at least 2 releases:
> - 1 around mid-May;
> - 1 around end of May.
>
> The first one would bundle a bunch of the fixes or improvements being
> worked on these days, making sure everything works as intended.
This part has
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Control: affects -1 + src:vice
Hi RMs,
[ Reason ]
My bad was still using non-official categories in desktop files. Now
this is corrected.
[ Impact ]
Find shortcuts to emulation binaries in
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:vice
Bug #1036449 [release.debian.org] unblock: vice/3.7.1+dfsg1-2
Added indication that 1036449 affects src:vice
--
1036449: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036449
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pr
36 matches
Mail list logo
