Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:fwknop
Bug #1034276 [release.debian.org] unblock: fwknop/2.6.10-16
Added indication that 1034276 affects src:fwknop
--
1034276: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034276
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: fwk...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:fwknop
Please unblock package fwknop
[ Reason ]
The AppArmor profile was incorrectly installed in the systemd
system servi
Your message dated Tue, 11 Apr 2023 21:04:26 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock heat
has caused the Debian Bug report #1034243,
regarding unblock: heat/19.0.0-2 (fix for CVE-2023-1625 / #1034186)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
On 2023-04-11 12:15:40 +0300, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> X-Debbugs-Cc: lua-readl...@packages.debian.org
> Control: affects -1 + src:lua-readline
>
>
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Bug #1034244 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): lua-readline/3.2-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo and confirmed.
--
1034244: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034244
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.o
As someone with a PITA package that's frequently dealing every month
with strange issues on lightly-used architectures, I'd support a Tier
II system for i386/armel/etc. However, at the risk of making this
overly complex - I would prefer to see a bit more granularity on a
per-package or per-prio
Your message dated Tue, 11 Apr 2023 21:02:17 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock mutter
has caused the Debian Bug report #1034167,
regarding unblock: mutter/43.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 11 Apr 2023 21:01:55 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock gnome-shell
has caused the Debian Bug report #1034166,
regarding unblock: gnome-shell/43.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: fsarchi...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:fsarchiver
Please unblock package fsarchiver
[ Reason ]
Creating file systems with recent versions of
btrfs-progs/e2fs
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:fsarchiver
Bug #1034265 [release.debian.org] unblock: fsarchiver/0.8.7-1
Added indication that 1034265 affects src:fsarchiver
--
1034265: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034265
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
along with the nvidia-graphics-drivers* packages, I'd like to upgrade
nvidia-modprobe to a new upstream release this time, too.
It's unusual that nvidia-modprobe sees any upda
Hi Adrian,
On 22-03-2023 12:08, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Suggestions for both
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/ReleaseCheckList
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/ReleaseCheckList/BookwormCheckList
They are Wiki's ;). But thanks for discussing it first.
Before the release
Add "
Dear DSA,
As is custom for the Release Team, I'm asking you what your plans are
with respect to testing upgrading DSA maintained machines to bookworm.
If my information is correct, in the past you'd first upgrade a non
critical machine to see if there's anything broken in bookworm that
prevents
Dear backports team,
On our pre-release checklist [1] it's noted that we should coordinate a
test build in the bookworm-backports archive. We recently did this for
security and there issues were encountered [2] showing the value of such
an exercise.
Do you want to perform such a test build in bo
Hi,
On 11-04-2023 15:21, Simon McVittie wrote:
Uploaded and built on all release architectures. There seem to be reports
of autopkgtest regressions, I'm not sure which of those are flaky and which
(if any) are genuine issues.
A brief inspection suggests they are all flaky. I rescheduled most o
Control: retitle -1 unblock: mutter/43.4-1
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On Mon, 10 Apr 2023 at 18:45:17 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2023-04-10 15:29:08 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > I'd like to upload a new upstream bug fix release of mutter.
>
> Please go ahead and remove the moreinf
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 unblock: mutter/43.4-1
Bug #1034167 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): mutter/43.4-1
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: mutter/43.4-1' from 'unblock (pre-approval):
mutter/43.4-1'.
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #1034167 [release.debian.org] unblock: mutt
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Control: retitle -1 unblock: gnome-shell/43.4-1
On Mon, 10 Apr 2023 at 18:41:07 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2023-04-10 15:27:52 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > I'd like to upload a new upstream bug fix release of gnome-shell.
>
> Please go ahead and remove t
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #1034166 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): gnome-shell/43.4-1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> retitle -1 unblock: gnome-shell/43.4-1
Bug #1034166 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): gnome-shell/43.4-1
Changed Bug title to 'unbloc
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Control: retitle -1 unblock: glib2.0/2.74.6-2
On Mon, 10 Apr 2023 at 18:23:06 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2023-04-10 13:17:32 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > I've been using this proposed glib2.0 update for a few days and I'd like
> > to upload it to unstable
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #1034149 [release.debian.org] unblock: (pre-approval): glib2.0/2.74.6-2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> retitle -1 unblock: glib2.0/2.74.6-2
Bug #1034149 [release.debian.org] unblock: (pre-approval): glib2.0/2.74.6-2
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: g
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:usb.ids
Bug #1034246 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
usb.ids/2023.01.16-0+deb11u1
Added indication that 1034246 affects src:usb.ids
--
1034246: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034246
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: usb@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:usb.ids
[ Reason ]
This new upstream version of the USB ID database adds a few USB devices.
[ Impact ]
New USB
(Dropping -cd@ and -release@ — and letting them know via bcc —, that's
probably less interesting for them at this point.)
Joerg Jaspert (2023-04-10):
> I prepared a little script. Now need a SSH key to allow.
Attached.
> Usage is simple, you MUST supply a version, you CAN supply a source and
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 1034198 bullseye-pu: package
> golang-github-containers-common/0.33.4+ds1-1+deb11u2
Bug #1034198 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
golang-github-containers-common/0.33.4+ds1-1+deb11u1
Changed Bug title to 'bullseye-pu: package
g
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 -moreinfo
Bug #1034134 [release.debian.org] [pre-approval] unblock: glibc/2.36-9
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1034134: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034134
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
control: tags -1 -moreinfo
On 2023-04-10 18:30, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
>
> On 2023-04-10 11:02:23 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> > X
Hi,
I would very much prefer to upload the latest point release from
upstream, however, if the release team prefers, here's a debdiff,
attached to this message, containing a more targeted fix.
Note that the debdiff contains a "quilt refresh" of the
ovs-ctl-ipsec.patch already present in Book
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear release team,
I'd like to upload OpenVSwitch 3.1.1 as the fix for CVE-2023-1668.
The upstream last point release contains only bugfixes, however,
the diff is still kind of significant
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: lua-readl...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:lua-readline
I'd like to upload lua-readline with a bugfix for #1034078 (see [1]).
[ Reason ]
This upload fixes #103
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:lua-readline
Bug #1034244 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): lua-readline/3.2-2
Added indication that 1034244 affects src:lua-readline
--
1034244: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034244
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contac
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package heat
[ Reason ]
This last upload fixes CVE-2023-1625 / #1034186 (information leak in the
Heat API).
[ Impact ]
Before this patch, "openstack stack show" shows parame
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: ti...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:tirex
Please unblock package tirex
It moves the systemd services back to /lib/systemd to fix #1034222.
[ Reason ]
Fix serv
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:tirex
Bug #1034242 [release.debian.org] unblock: tirex/0.7.0-3
Added indication that 1034242 affects src:tirex
--
1034242: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034242
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with probl
34 matches
Mail list logo
