Processed: Re: Bug#1032073: unblock: scipy/1.10.1-1

2023-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #1032073 [release.debian.org] unblock: scipy/1.10.1-1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1032073: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032073 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1032073: unblock: scipy/1.10.1-1

2023-02-27 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: tags -1 + confirmed Hi Drew On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 14:12, Drew Parsons wrote: > I recommend we allow scipy 1.10.1 into bookworm (assuming it passes 10 > day freeze testing as normal). I'm filing this bug to check if you > agree that's a good idea before building and uploading to unstabl

Bug#1032004: marked as done (nmu: packages built by golang-1.15)

2023-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2023 00:11:34 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1032004: nmu: packages built by golang-1.15 has caused the Debian Bug report #1032004, regarding nmu: packages built by golang-1.15 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1030851: bullseye-pu: package symfony/4.4.19+dfsg-2+deb11u2

2023-02-27 Thread David Prévot
Hi, Le 27/02/2023 à 08:18, David Prévot a écrit : Le 26/02/2023 à 21:54, Paul Gevers a écrit : On 08-02-2023 13:53, David Prévot wrote: [ Tests ] I didn’t test it thoroughly (I doubt to have much time for at least another week), but it passes There are issues with the installability of src:s

Bug#1031124: marked as done (unblock: mariadb/1:10.11.2-1)

2023-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 27 Feb 2023 22:06:36 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1031124: unblock: mariadb/1:10.11.1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1031124, regarding unblock: mariadb/1:10.11.2-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#1032037: marked as done (unblock: linux/6.1.12-1)

2023-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 27 Feb 2023 21:27:47 +0100 with message-id <29b08cf6-780d-3a7e-fa20-f6b1b33a1...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1032037: unblock: linux/6.1.12-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1032037, regarding unblock: linux/6.1.12-1 to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#1032065: marked as done (ola: request RT acknowledgement for update to upstream version 0.10.9)

2023-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 27 Feb 2023 21:25:01 +0100 with message-id <58fa5fff-5e22-eb68-19ab-bdb6ab694...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1032065: ola: request RT acknowledgement for update to upstream version 0.10.9 has caused the Debian Bug report #1032065, regarding ola: request RT acknowle

Bug#1031927: Handling the libsgutils2-2 #994758 bookworm-ignore

2023-02-27 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: tags 994758 - bookworm-ignore Hi Adrian, Thanks for caring. On 25-02-2023 14:30, Adrian Bunk wrote: With the bookworm-ignore for #994758, I'll admit that I misjudged that bug; with this message I'll clear the bookworm-ignore tag. bullseye and bookworm will ship libsgutils2-2 pac

Bug#1031635: bullseye-pu: package snakeyaml/1.28-1

2023-02-27 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 10:29:07PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > Hi, > > Am Freitag, dem 24.02.2023 um 16:01 +0100 schrieb Moritz Mühlenhoff: > [...] > > Could we also ship the README.Debian.security that was recently added > > in unstable to bullseye/buster? > > I've just uploaded a new revisi

Bug#1031587: [request-tracker-maintainers] Bug#1031587: Handling of the request-tracker4 -> request-tracker5 transition in bookworm

2023-02-27 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 04:54:33PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi, > > On 20-02-2023 13:09, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > If the release team would be willing to grant an exception to the policy > > to get this done, we can get this wrapped up inside a week I expect.

Bug#1032073: unblock: scipy/1.10.1-1

2023-02-27 Thread Drew Parsons
Copying the upstream scipy 1.10.1 Release Notes for your convenience. From https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/release.1.10.1.html SciPy 1.10.1 is a bug-fix release with no new features compared to 1.10.0. Issues closed for 1.10.1 #14980: BUG: Johnson’s algorithm fails without negative cyc

Bug#1032073: unblock: scipy/1.10.1-1

2023-02-27 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: sc...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:scipy Please unblock package scipy This is a prerequest, before uploading. [ Reason ] scipy is central tool for numerical

Processed: unblock: scipy/1.10.1-1

2023-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:scipy Bug #1032073 [release.debian.org] unblock: scipy/1.10.1-1 Added indication that 1032073 affects src:scipy -- 1032073: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032073 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with prob

Bug#1032065: ola: request RT acknowledgement for update to upstream version 0.10.9

2023-02-27 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Hi release team! Since the current state of the freeze, I thought I'd check with you guys before uploading ola 0.10.9. A bit of background: there were a few compatibility bugs in ola 0.10.8 (currently in stable) which meant that it was kicked out of t