Processed: Re: Bug#1024845: transition: linphone-stack

Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1024845 [release.debian.org] transition: linphone-stack Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1024845: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024845 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1024845: transition: linphone-stack

Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi Bernhard On 2022-11-26 17:44:15 +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Dear release team, > > once again, hopefully for the last time before the relea

Bug#1018945: marked as done (transition: libbpf)

Your message dated Sun, 27 Nov 2022 12:11:14 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1018945: transition: libbpf has caused the Debian Bug report #1018945, regarding transition: libbpf to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#1024876: transition: coq 8.16.1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: jpu...@debian.org X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers A new upstream version of Coq is out ; it requires rebuilding all depending packages (see below). I'm waiting for

Re: Help understanding why a package isn't migrating

On 2022-11-24 09:47:51 -0500, Scott Talbert wrote: > On Thu, 24 Nov 2022, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > > Hi Scott > > > > On 2022-11-23 19:38:26 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > Hi Scott, > > > > > > On 23-11-2022 15:26, Scott Talbert wrote: > > > > Hi Release Team, > > > > > > > > I'm trying t