Bug#1018076: mini-transition: gjs built against mozjs102

2022-09-25 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 at 15:41:04 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Could you blacklist the test > > “ large-arraybuffers/basic.js” > > on all affected big-endian targets (powerpc, ppc64, sparc64)? > > The test is blacklist on s390x and fails on powerpc and ppc64 as well. I'm not intendin

Processed: Re: Bug#1020564: transition: coq-simple-io

2022-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1020564 [release.debian.org] transition: coq-simple-io Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1020564: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020564 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#1020541: transition: rakudo

2022-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1020541 [release.debian.org] transition: rakudo Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1020541: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020541 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1020541: transition: rakudo

2022-09-25 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 2022-09-22 19:23:13 -0400, M. Zhou wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Dear release team, > > We would like to upload rakudo 2022.07 to unstable (2022.04). > Hence requesti

Bug#1020564: transition: coq-simple-io

2022-09-25 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 2022-09-23 14:36:02 +0200, julien.pu...@gmail.com wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-Debbugs-Cc: jpu...@debian.org > X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers > > > Hi, > >

Bug#1018076: mini-transition: gjs built against mozjs102

2022-09-25 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hello! > On Sep 25, 2022, at 3:08 PM, Simon McVittie wrote: > > Control: retitle -1 mini-transition: gjs built against mozjs102 > Control: unblock -1 by 1018819 > Control: tags -1 = pending > >> On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 at 11:19:30 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: >> I think we need to be looking at th

Processed: Re: Bug#1018076: mini-transition: gjs built against mozjs102

2022-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > retitle -1 mini-transition: gjs built against mozjs102 Bug #1018076 [release.debian.org] transition: gjs and gnome-shell likely to be removed from armel Changed Bug title to 'mini-transition: gjs built against mozjs102' from 'transition: gjs and gnome-shell likely

Bug#1018076: mini-transition: gjs built against mozjs102

2022-09-25 Thread Simon McVittie
Control: retitle -1 mini-transition: gjs built against mozjs102 Control: unblock -1 by 1018819 Control: tags -1 = pending On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 at 11:19:30 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > I think we need to be looking at the possibility of doing > architecture-specific removals of gjs and dependent p

Bug#1020685: transition: thrift

2022-09-25 Thread GCS
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi RMs, Small transition of Thrift as the only reverse dependency is gnuradio. It builds fine with the 0.17.0 version of Thrift already in experimental. Thanks for considering, Laszlo/G

Bug#1020684: transition: rocksdb

2022-09-25 Thread GCS
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi RMs, Small transition of RocksDB as the only reverse dependency is balboa. It builds fine with the 7.6.0 version of RocksDB already in experimental. Thanks for considering, Laszlo/GC