Re: Status of Debian Installer Bookworm Alpha 1: 2 blockers

2022-09-16 Thread Samuel Thibault
Cyril Brulebois, le sam. 17 sept. 2022 02:21:27 +0200, a ecrit: > Samuel Thibault (2022-09-17): > > Cyril Brulebois, le sam. 17 sept. 2022 01:41:52 +0200, a ecrit: > > > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/commit/23e4451d7132e3bac7bd589747a44a776ea69834 > > > > > >

Re: Status of Debian Installer Bookworm Alpha 1: 2 blockers

2022-09-16 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Samuel Thibault (2022-09-17): > Cyril Brulebois, le sam. 17 sept. 2022 01:41:52 +0200, a ecrit: > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/commit/23e4451d7132e3bac7bd589747a44a776ea69834 > > > > To get back on track with the release, I'm tempted to just revert that > >

Re: Status of Debian Installer Bookworm Alpha 1: 2 blockers

2022-09-16 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Cyril Brulebois, le sam. 17 sept. 2022 01:41:52 +0200, a ecrit: > > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/commit/23e4451d7132e3bac7bd589747a44a776ea69834 > > To get back on track with the release, I'm tempted to just revert that > commit right away, I have reverted

Status of Debian Installer Bookworm Alpha 1: 2 blockers

2022-09-16 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi folks, As you might know, the installer is prepared this way: - debian-installer MMDD uploaded to unstable; - a debian-installer-images tarball (one per arch) gets generated during the build and gets unpacked into installer-/ directories for unstable (scripts/debian/byhand-di in dak

Re: Bug#1019724: warning: stray \ before - causes autopkgtest failure

2022-09-16 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Santiago, On 15-09-2022 09:26, Paul Gevers wrote: I am trying to schedule autopkgtests in unstable on amd64 for all source packages that have one. All results are now in. Only several test failed due this warning: the known dpkg and cjet and the newly found nagios-plugins-contrib, logcheck

Bug#961654: buster-pu: package bzip2/1.0.6-9.2~deb10u1

2022-09-16 Thread Santiago R.R.
El 16/09/22 a las 09:39, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort escribió: > Hi Santiago, > > On 15/09/2022 09:52, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > On 14/09/2022 15:42, Santiago R.R. wrote: > > > El 14/09/22 a las 13:58, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort escribió: > > > > On 13/09/2022 16:46, Sylvain Beucler wrote: > > > >

Bug#1019915: bullseye-pu: package dojo/1.15.4+dfsg1-1+deb11u1

2022-09-16 Thread Yadd
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu [ Reason ] dojo is vulnerable to prototype pollution (#1014785, CVE-2021-23450) [ Impact ] Medium vulnerability [ Tests ] No new test here [ Risks ] No risk, patch is trivial [

Bug#961654: buster-pu: package bzip2/1.0.6-9.2~deb10u1

2022-09-16 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Hi Santiago, On 15/09/2022 09:52, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 14/09/2022 15:42, Santiago R.R. wrote: El 14/09/22 a las 13:58, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort escribió: On 13/09/2022 16:46, Sylvain Beucler wrote: Hi, IIUC this is about fixing 2 non-security bugs, that were introduced prior to bus