Re: linux migration to testing

2022-08-01 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2022-08-01 at 22:53 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Ben, > > On 01-08-2022 22:46, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > linux 5.18.14-1 is currently blocked from migration due to a test > > regression on some architectures. > > > > This is actually not a regression: there's a new test case, and it was

Re: linux migration to testing

2022-08-01 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Ben, On 01-08-2022 22:46, Ben Hutchings wrote: linux 5.18.14-1 is currently blocked from migration due to a test regression on some architectures. This is actually not a regression: there's a new test case, and it was defined wrongly for architectures other than amd64 and arm64. That should

linux migration to testing

2022-08-01 Thread Ben Hutchings
linux 5.18.14-1 is currently blocked from migration due to a test regression on some architectures. This is actually not a regression: there's a new test case, and it was defined wrongly for architectures other than amd64 and arm64. That should be fixed with the next upload, but I'd rather not go

Bug#1016496: nmu: abinit_9.6.2-1

2022-08-01 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 8/1/22 22:34, Paul Gevers wrote: On 01-08-2022 22:18, Bas Couwenberg wrote: nmu abinit_9.6.2-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with libnetcdff7 (>= 4.6.0+ds-1)" To resolve the autopkgtest failure reported in #1016414, the package needs to be rebuilt. That normally means it's papering over

Bug#1016496: nmu: abinit_9.6.2-1

2022-08-01 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Bas, On 01-08-2022 22:18, Bas Couwenberg wrote: nmu abinit_9.6.2-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with libnetcdff7 (>= 4.6.0+ds-1)" To resolve the autopkgtest failure reported in #1016414, the package needs to be rebuilt. That normally means it's papering over the real issue. Are you sur

Bug#1016496: nmu: abinit_9.6.2-1

2022-08-01 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu abinit_9.6.2-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with libnetcdff7 (>= 4.6.0+ds-1)" To resolve the autopkgtest failure reported in #1016414, the package needs to be rebuilt. Kind Regards,

Processed: Re: transition: gnome-desktop 43

2022-08-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1016180 by 1016396 Bug #1016180 [release.debian.org] transition: gnome-desktop 43 1016180 was blocked by: 1016175 1016171 1016180 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1016180: 1016396 > End of message, stopping processing here

Re: FUSE 3 transition

2022-08-01 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Sat, 30 Jul 2022, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 9:56 PM Ben Hutchings wrote: > > - Is there a plan to change reverse-dependencies to depend on fuse3, so > > that such conflicts don't occur? > Please note I do not maintain the reverse dependent fuse2 packages. > But

Bug#1015254: transition: opencascade

2022-08-01 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi Tobi On Sun, 31 Jul 2022 at 16:51, Tobias Frost wrote: > I've uploading 7.6.3 right now to experimental; as I removed the confirmed > tag, please reACK > the "go ahead" -- I've tested that all r-depends that worked before are still > compiling reACK Regards

Processed: Re: Bug#1015254: transition: opencascade

2022-08-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1015254 [release.debian.org] transition: opencascade Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1015254: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1015254 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems