Processing changes file: llvm-toolchain-13_13.0.1-6~deb10u2_armel-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: cargo-mozilla_0.57.0-7~deb10u1_armhf-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
rustc-mozilla_1.59.0+dfsg1-1~deb10u1_armhf-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
On Saturday, July 16, 2022 12:28:33 P.M. CDT Christian Marillat wrote:
> On 16 juil. 2022 12:02, Steven Robbins wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Certainly one can propose. However, one cannot really expect upstream to
> > change their architecture away from ffmpeg by a given time any more than
> > one ca
On 16 juil. 2022 12:02, Steven Robbins wrote:
[...]
> Certainly one can propose. However, one cannot really expect upstream to
> change their architecture away from ffmpeg by a given time any more than one
> can expect them to adapt to ffmeg ABI break in that time.
Removed functions in versi
On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 10:13:20 +0200 Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
> > > Reverse dependencies had 4 months to fix their bugs, so I'm going
> > > ahead with this one.
> >
> > Not even close to enough time for all affected upstream teams.
>
> The 4 months only reflects the Debian timeline. If upstreams
Processing changes file: cargo-mozilla_0.57.0-7~deb10u1_s390x-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 11:46 AM Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2022-07-16 at 11:20 -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
> [...]
> > i386 is anchient in tech terms it was introduced in 1985. If debian wants
> > to keep supporting 32 bit OS then it should bump up to i686.
> [...]
>
> We did that ye
Processing changes file: rust-cbindgen_0.23.0-1~deb11u1_mips64el-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
On Sat, 2022-07-16 at 11:20 -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
[...]
> i386 is anchient in tech terms it was introduced in 1985. If debian wants
> to keep supporting 32 bit OS then it should bump up to i686.
[...]
We did that years ago. We just didn't rename the architecture.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutc
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 03:54:21PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2022-07-16 at 06:23 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 01:51:21PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>...
> > This is not limited to i386, it is also quite relevant for embedded arm
> > where new products using 32-
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 7:51 AM Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-06-22 at 10:05 +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As part of the interim architecture qualification for bookworm, we
> > request that DSA, the security team, Wanna build, and the toolchain
> > maintainers review and updat
Processing changes file:
rustc-mozilla_1.59.0+dfsg1-1~deb10u1_s390x-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
On Sat, 2022-07-16 at 06:23 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 01:51:21PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >
> > For i386, I have some concerns about upstream support of the Linux
> > kernel. CPU security mitigations for x86 are concentrated on amd64,
> > with i386 being left behind
On 2022-07-10, at 17:19:16 +0100, Jeremy Sowden wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: bullseye
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
>
> The related xtables-addons bug is:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1014680
>
> [ Reas
Processing changes file:
llvm-toolchain-13_13.0.1-6~deb10u2_mipsel-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
rustc-mozilla_1.59.0+dfsg1-1~deb11u1_mips64el-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 11:44:41 +0200
with message-id <2be8278c-0de8-bd02-5e3e-96c44af54...@pfft.no>
and subject line Re: Bug#1014939: transition: openscap
has caused the Debian Bug report #1014939,
regarding transition: openscap
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Processing changes file: cargo-mozilla_0.57.0-7~deb10u1_ppc64el-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: llvm-toolchain-13_13.0.1-6~deb10u2_arm64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: llvm-toolchain-13_13.0.1-6~deb10u2_armhf-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
21 matches
Mail list logo
