Processed: Re: Bug#1012362: transition: luajit

2022-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #1012362 [release.debian.org] transition: luajit Added tag(s) confirmed. > forwarded -1 > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libluajit2-support.html Bug #1012362 [release.debian.org] transition: luajit Set Bug forwarded-to-address to '

Bug#1012362: transition: luajit

2022-06-06 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: tag -1 confirmed Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libluajit2-support.html Hi Mo, On 05-06-2022 19:30, M. Zhou wrote: So, currently I have a pending commit[2] modifying the dependency template[1], so that src:luajit reverse dependencies can be rebuilt w

Re: Bug#1012166: ITP: haskell-tzdata -- Haskell package that distributes the standard time zone database

2022-06-06 Thread Robert Greener
Hi Philipp, On Mon, 2022-06-06 at 17:19 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > On 31.05.22 10:14, Robert Greener wrote: > > The goal of this package is to distribute the standard Time Zone > > Database in a cabal package, so that it can be used in Haskell > > programs uniformly on all platforms. > > > > Th

Re: Bug#1012166: ITP: haskell-tzdata -- Haskell package that distributes the standard time zone database

2022-06-06 Thread Philipp Kern
Hi, On 31.05.22 10:14, Robert Greener wrote: The goal of this package is to distribute the standard Time Zone Database in a cabal package, so that it can be used in Haskell programs uniformly on all platforms. This package currently ships the 2022a version of the time zone database. The vers

Bug#1012299: marked as done (RM: src:ruby-uglifier/2.7.2+dfsg-2)

2022-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 6 Jun 2022 12:24:29 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1012299: RM: src:ruby-uglifier/2.7.2+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1012299, regarding RM: src:ruby-uglifier/2.7.2+dfsg-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1011630: marked as done (transition: jimtcl)

2022-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 6 Jun 2022 11:50:09 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1011630: transition: jimtcl has caused the Debian Bug report #1011630, regarding transition: jimtcl to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Processed: Re: Bug#1012348: transition: rocksdb

2022-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1012348 [release.debian.org] transition: rocksdb Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1012348: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1012348 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1012348: transition: rocksdb

2022-06-06 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 2022-06-05 10:26:25, László Böszörményi wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hi RMs, > > Transition request to show my intentions and track what's blocking. > Two packages,

Uploading linux (5.18.2-1)

2022-06-06 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi I would like to upload linux version 5.18.2 to unstable. This is a new upstream version and therefore involves an ABI bump. Some CVE/security fixes are included, in particular CVE-2022-1966, CVE-2022-1972, CVE-2022-1852 and ZDI-CAN-17291. The pending changes in the package are apart the new