Processing control commands:
> clone -1 -2
Bug #1010196 [release.debian.org] RM: elog/3.1.3-1-1
Bug 1010196 cloned as bug 1010197
> retitle -1 RM: elog/3.1.3-1-1 (from bullseye)
Bug #1010196 [release.debian.org] RM: elog/3.1.3-1-1
Changed Bug title to 'RM: elog/3.1.3-1-1 (from bullseye)' from 'RM:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org,t...@security.debian.org
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: retitle -1 RM: elog/3.1.3-1-1 (from bullseye)
Control: retitle -2 RM: elog/3.1.3-1-1 (from buster)
Dear Stab
Hi Thorsten,
On 25-04-2022 23:47, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
On Sun, 24 Apr 2022, Paul Gevers wrote:
If I understand correctly, if this is only about rebuilds, just
request an binNMU with the usual process (reportbug recommended).
from my point of view binNMUs are not the right way here.
Due to
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
As usual, a distro-info-data update.
[ Reason ]
This one only has Ubuntu changes, but still worth keeping up-to-date in
stable.
* Update data to 0.53:
- Add Ubuntu 22.10,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
As usual, a distro-info-data update.
[ Reason ]
This one only has Ubuntu changes, but still worth keeping up-to-date in
stable.
* Update data to 0.53, without new columns:
Hi Paul,
On Sun, 24 Apr 2022, Paul Gevers wrote:
If I understand correctly, if this is only about rebuilds, just request an
binNMU with the usual process (reportbug recommended).
from my point of view binNMUs are not the right way here.
Due to possibly long dependency chains of golang packages
Processing control commands:
> block 1009865 by -1
Bug #1009865 [release.debian.org] transition: octave
1009865 was not blocked by any bugs.
1009865 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1009865: 1010164
--
1009865: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1009865
1010164:
Hi Andreas,
On 07-04-2022 09:21, Andreas Tille wrote:
Sorry, that's my fault. I'm preparing an upload to fix #1007984
targeting new.
Looking at
https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/netpbm-free_2:10.98.00-1.html, is
there any reason why you didn't add "Provides:
libnetpbm9-dev, libnetpbm10-dev
8 matches
Mail list logo