Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hello,
I'd like to upload the attached changes to bullseye (already queued)
[ Reason ]
People have reported that when they work on the linux console with the
espeakup screen read
On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 06:53:52PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 21:32 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > This update fixes the download of container images using the
> > "download"
> > template. pool.sks-keyservers.net is not active anymore
On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 05:41:40PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Tue, 2022-02-15 at 21:33 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > Control: reopen -1
> >
> > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 11:44:24AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > > > [ Reason ]
> > > > Version 0.8.
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Severity: normal
pqiv has a Recommends on the old libwebp6 library. The Recommends
doesn't show up on the transition tracker but it should still be
rebuilt.
nmu pqiv_2.12-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild aga
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hello,
I would like to upload the attached change to bullseye (already uploaded
to the queue).
[ Reason ]
Users have reported that when they are building large packages in
parall
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # removing confirmed until SRM have confirmed the new version
> tags 1000342 - confirmed
Bug #1000342 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package mariadb-10.5
10.5.15-0+deb11u1
Removed tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please cont
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear Release team,
[ Reason ]
One of our users requested a new upload to fix this bug:
https://bugs.debian.org/1001082.
[ Impact ]
This bug causes various applications to segfault
On 22-02-19 17:54:40, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Please go ahead; sorry for the delay.
Uploaded, thanks.
Cheers,
Georg
Your message dated Sun, 20 Feb 2022 16:41:15 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1005107: transition: gmerlin-avdecoder
has caused the Debian Bug report #1005107,
regarding transition: gmerlin-avdecoder
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Sun, 20 Feb 2022 16:41:01 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1005106: transition: gmerlin
has caused the Debian Bug report #1005106,
regarding transition: gmerlin
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Sun, 20 Feb 2022 16:40:28 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1005105: transition: gavl
has caused the Debian Bug report #1005105,
regarding transition: gavl
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 20 Feb 2022 16:39:59 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1005060: transition: ace
has caused the Debian Bug report #1005060,
regarding transition: ace
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Hi,
On 18-02-2022 21:23, Paul Gevers wrote:
Also the autopkgtest regressions don't look pretty yet, did you
already have a look:
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=ruby-defaults
I'll try to take a look at this list and see what's going on.
coderay seems to have a patch to fix this in
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 9:30 PM Sudip Mukherjee
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 7:41 PM Sebastian Ramacher
> wrote:
> >
> > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> >
> > On 2022-02-13 18:52:08 +, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Just to add here, diagnostics FTBFS has been fixed and I ha
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 1003548
Bug #1006160 [lutris] lutris: fails to install
1006160 was not blocked by any bugs.
1006160 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1006160: 1003548
--
1006160: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1006160
Debian Bug Tra
Hi Adam,
On 19.02.22 20:11, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Please go ahead.
ok, thanks, uploaded.
While being at it, I also uploaded zziplib/0.13.62-3.2+deb10u1 which is
handled by #1004049.
I hope you don't mind.
Thorsten
ok, thanks, uploaded.
Thorsten
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 1004915 by 1005448
Bug #1004915 [release.debian.org] transition: ruby2.7-rm
1004915 was blocked by: 1006119 1001217 1001022 998499 1005947
1004915 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1004915: 1005448
> block 1004915 by 100542
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 1004915 by 1001022
Bug #1004915 [release.debian.org] transition: ruby2.7-rm
1004915 was blocked by: 1005947 1001217
1004915 was blocking: 1006119
Added blocking bug(s) of 1004915: 1001022
> block 1004915 by 998499
Bug #1004915 [release.debia
Your message dated Sun, 20 Feb 2022 10:25:01 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1006154: nmu: evolution-rss_0.3.96-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1006154,
regarding nmu: evolution-rss_0.3.96-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 buster-pu: package mariadb-10.5 10.5.15-0+deb11u1
Bug #1000342 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package mariadb-10.5
10.5.13-0+deb11u1
Changed Bug title to 'buster-pu: package mariadb-10.5 10.5.15-0+deb11u1' from
'bullseye-pu: package mariadb-10.5 10.5.
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 buster-pu: package mariadb-10.3 10.3.34-0+deb10u1
Bug #1000341 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package mariadb-10.3
10.3.32-0+deb10u1
Changed Bug title to 'buster-pu: package mariadb-10.3 10.3.34-0+deb10u1' from
'buster-pu: package mariadb-10.3 10.3.32-0
22 matches
Mail list logo
