Bug#1005949: bullseye-pu: package glibc/2.31-13+deb11u3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu [ Reason ] There are multiple fixes in this upload: - 4 security bugs - a fix to avoid preinst script failure when running on kernel x.y.z with z > 255. - a fix to avoid changes

Bug#1005903: marked as done (nmu: rime-related packages (for non source-only upload))

Your message dated Thu, 17 Feb 2022 21:20:28 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1005903: nmu: rime-related packages (for non source-only upload) has caused the Debian Bug report #1005903, regarding nmu: rime-related packages (for non source-only upload) to be marked as done. This mea

Bug#1003176: marked as done (transition: perl 5.34)

Your message dated Thu, 17 Feb 2022 21:06:11 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1003176: transition: perl 5.34 has caused the Debian Bug report #1003176, regarding transition: perl 5.34 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Processed: closing 1005095, closing 1005096, closing 1005097, closing 1005098, closing 1005100

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # those binNMUs were scheduled > close 1005095 Bug #1005095 [release.debian.org] nmu: gnome-settings-daemon_41.0-4 Marked Bug as done > close 1005096 Bug #1005096 [release.debian.org] nmu: cinnamon-control-center_5.2.1-1 Marked Bug as done > close

Bug#1005068: marked as done (transition (unplanned?): libwacom9)

Your message dated Thu, 17 Feb 2022 21:02:57 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1005068: transition (unplanned?): libwacom9 has caused the Debian Bug report #1005068, regarding transition (unplanned?): libwacom9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1004915: transition: ruby2.7-rm

Em 17/02/2022 12:09, Paul Gevers escreveu: Control: tags -1 confirmed On 17-02-2022 13:42, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: Can I prepare a ruby-defaults upload targeting unstable just switching the default to ruby3.0 and keeping ruby2.7? Please go ahead. I just uploaded ruby-defaults/1:3.0 to unst

Processed: Re: Bug#1004915: transition: ruby2.7-rm

Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1004915 [release.debian.org] transition: ruby2.7-rm Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1004915: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004915 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1004915: transition: ruby2.7-rm

Control: tags -1 confirmed On 17-02-2022 13:42, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: Can I prepare a ruby-defaults upload targeting unstable just switching the default to ruby3.0 and keeping ruby2.7? Please go ahead. Paul OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1004915: transition: ruby2.7-rm

Hi, On 17-02-2022 13:42, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: Can I prepare a ruby-defaults upload targeting unstable just switching the default to ruby3.0 and keeping ruby2.7? I first want to see the new tracker packages (should be available soon, but I'm not sure I have time until this evening to look).

Bug#1004915: transition: ruby2.7-rm

Hi, Em 17/02/2022 09:33, Paul Gevers escreveu: Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ruby3.0-default.html Hi Antonio, Lucas On 15-02-2022 21:31, Antonio Terceiro wrote: I saw that this was already added to the list of planned transitions, thanks for that. accordin

Bug#1004915: transition: ruby2.7-rm

Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ruby3.0-default.html Hi Antonio, Lucas On 15-02-2022 21:31, Antonio Terceiro wrote: I saw that this was already added to the list of planned transitions, thanks for that. according to https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/