Processed: add FTBFS bug

2022-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 976811 by 1003007 Bug #976811 [release.debian.org] transition: php8.1 976811 was blocked by: 1000654 1000642 1000568 977403 977401 977404 977400 977687 977337 978457 1000596 1002218 977340 1000653 1000637 1000571 977186 980567 1000647 9773

Re: chromium: Update to version 94.0.4606.61 (security-fixes)

2022-01-02 Thread Andres Salomon
On Sun, 2 Jan 2022 20:15:01 +0100 Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Sat, Jan 01, 2022 at 01:23:09PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > > How should I handle this? NMU to sid, let people try it out, and > > then deal with buster/bullseye? > > Yeah, let's proceed with unstable first in any case. > > >

Re: chromium: Update to version 94.0.4606.61 (security-fixes)

2022-01-02 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Sat, Jan 01, 2022 at 01:23:09PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > How should I handle this? NMU to sid, let people try it out, and then > deal with buster/bullseye? Yeah, let's proceed with unstable first in any case. > Upload everything all at once? I'm also > going to try building for buster, u

Re: chromium: Update to version 94.0.4606.61 (security-fixes)

2022-01-02 Thread Andres Salomon
On 1/2/22 12:53 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: On Sat, Jan 01, 2022 at 01:23:09PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: I've got 96.0.4664.110 building on both bullseye and sid Trying it, I see it still build-depends on python-jinja2. That package is now gone, so it's not actually buildable in sid anymore

Re: chromium: Update to version 94.0.4606.61 (security-fixes)

2022-01-02 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 06:53:51PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Correlated, do you know how long do they plan on keeping using python2? > That's plainly unsuitable, it really is not going to last much longer in > debian. Current state of the Python 3 upstream migration can be found here: https:/

Re: chromium: Update to version 94.0.4606.61 (security-fixes)

2022-01-02 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sat, Jan 01, 2022 at 01:23:09PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > > I've got 96.0.4664.110 building on both bullseye and sid Trying it, I see it still build-depends on python-jinja2. That package is now gone, so it's not actually buildable in sid anymore. Correlated, do you know how long do they

Bug#1003004: transition: capnproto

2022-01-02 Thread tony mancill
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi Release Team, capnproto 0.8.0 has been in experimental for over a year now [1], so there is already an auto-transition page [2]. All of the reverse dependencies *except* for clickhou

Bug#1002956: bullseye-pu: package rabbitmq-server/3.8.9-3 CVE-2021-32718, CVE-2021-32719

2022-01-02 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Thomas, On Sat, Jan 01, 2022 at 06:57:42PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: bullseye > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > [ Reason ] > Hi, > > I'd like to update rabbitmq-server to address: > https://bugs.debian