Your message dated Fri, 3 Dec 2021 08:55:53 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#999565: transition: fluidsynth
has caused the Debian Bug report #999565,
regarding transition: fluidsynth
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Fri, 3 Dec 2021 08:55:21 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#997917: transition: aom
has caused the Debian Bug report #997917,
regarding transition: aom
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
OSRM,
To support updates to firefox-esr and thunderbird, I have prepared a
rustc update. Note that the updated source package is ca
On 2 December 2021 at 15:57, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| Yep. It's in the queue by now. I sometimes forget if an experimental ->
| unstable passage does or does not need an orig.tar.gz to go along or not but
| the bots will tell me if so :)
And by now in unstable.
Thanks so much for looking afte
On 2 December 2021 at 22:39, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
| On 2021-12-02 15:11:20, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > On 2 December 2021 at 20:55, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
| > | gsl cleared NEW thanks to ta. So this should be good to go.
| > |
| > | Please go ahead with the upload to unstable.
| >
On 2021-12-02 15:11:20, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 2 December 2021 at 20:55, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> | gsl cleared NEW thanks to ta. So this should be good to go.
> |
> | Please go ahead with the upload to unstable.
>
> Will do. Without any other requirements, correct? I.e. standard upl
On 1/12/21 22:32, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
I have already scheduled the binNMUs. See
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libotf.html
Thanks!
On 2 December 2021 at 20:55, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
| gsl cleared NEW thanks to ta. So this should be good to go.
|
| Please go ahead with the upload to unstable.
Will do. Without any other requirements, correct? I.e. standard upload which
thanks to Patrick's work will be around a new libgsl
Control: tags -1 = confirmed
On 2021-12-01 20:39:24, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 1 December 2021 at 21:41, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> | Indeed, it will need a trip through NEW. So going via experimental would
> | be appreciated. But, once it passed NEW, you can then immediatly follow
> | up
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 = confirmed
Bug #998192 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: Transition for gsl-2.7 /
libgsl26
Added tag(s) confirmed; removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
998192: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998192
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...
On 11/23/21 14:34, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
[ Reason ]
The LVBAG driver in GDAL 3.2.2 is unable to process BAG 2.0 Extract file
tags 1000511 - moreinfo
fixed 995610 2.12.5
thanks
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 11:21:56PM +0100, Wolfgang Schweer wrote:
> > The metadata for the first bug implies that it affects unstable and is
> > not yet fixed there. Could you please confirm the status?
> Yes, the bug is also fixed in unstable, p
On 1 December 2021 at 21:47, Patrick Alken wrote:
| Ok please send along the patches.
Sure thing. They are actually 'in the open' as we (== Debian devs) these days
have most / all work in git(-lab via our instance at salsa.debian.org). See
this directory and note that the 'series' file governs
13 matches
Mail list logo
