Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: 969...@bugs.debian.org
Please unblock package node-setimmediate
[ Reason ]
node-setimmediate is RC-buggy (#969611):
* broken symlinks in node-setimmediate documentation
* un
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: 991...@bugs.debian.org
Please unblock package twitter-bootstrap4
[ Reason ]
4.5.2+dfsg1-7 changes missed some .map files (scss-to-css). This version
reinstall them (RC bug #99
Hi Shengjing,
On 06-08-2021 22:01, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> Should we fix it before the bullseye release?
No, at least not in 11.0.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 1:51 AM Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> Source: golang-1.15
> Version: 1.15.9-6
> Severity: important
> Tags: security upstream
> Forwarded: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/46866
> X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The following v
Your message dated Fri, 6 Aug 2021 14:31:35 +0200
with message-id <8aaca04e-a73b-34a0-df9e-17be11832...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#991915: unblock: otrs2/6.0.32-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #991915,
regarding unblock: otrs2/6.0.32-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Hi Paul,
On 21-08-06 14:07:00, Paul Gevers wrote:
> That's part of the equation, yes.
Thanks for clarifying.
> I won't speak for SRM, but I would expect so.
Thanks!
> Tip: reportbug from bullseye has a better template for unblock and p-u
> bugs than buster. Please be verbose on impact, tests a
Hi Georg,
On 06-08-2021 11:07, Georg Faerber wrote:
>
> On 21-08-06 08:32:20, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> It's too late for changes like this one.
>
> Is this due to mat2 being a key package?
That's part of the equation, yes.
> Besides, would this potentially accepted in 11.1?
I won't speak for SRM
Your message dated Fri, 6 Aug 2021 14:02:36 +0200
with message-id <3aed414c-7985-ac09-d788-198d394b0...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#991811: unblock: libapache2-mod-auth-openidc/2.4.9-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #991811,
regarding unblock: libapache2-mod-auth-openidc/2.4.9-1
to be ma
Your message dated Fri, 6 Aug 2021 14:00:01 +0200
with message-id <641aec73-1481-974e-205c-d78acc25f...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#991940: unblock: munge/0.5.14-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #991940,
regarding unblock: munge/0.5.14-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package munge
[ Reason ]
* Cherry-pick upstream patch to allow to upgrade from buster to bullseye
[ Impact ]
Remove some minor tests to fix kfreebsd builds and a useless che
Hi Paul,
hi Salvatore,
Am 06.08.21 um 09:32 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso:
>>
>> It's *very* late in the freeze so I need an answer *real soon*. You
>> didn't tell us how you tested the package, how upstream tested the
>> changes and how you *judge* the changes between bullseye and sid. I
>> can't
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your reply.
On 21-08-06 08:32:20, Paul Gevers wrote:
> It's too late for changes like this one.
Is this due to mat2 being a key package?
Besides, would this potentially accepted in 11.1?
Cheers,
Georg
HI Paul,
On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 08:40:24AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Christopher,
>
> On 02-08-2021 13:33, Christoph Martin wrote:
> > Please unblock package libapache2-mod-auth-openidc
> >
> > currently the version 2.4.4.1-2 of libapache2-mod-auth-openidc is in
> > testing/bullseye . Some
13 matches
Mail list logo
