Your message dated Sun, 18 Jul 2021 20:55:55 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock django-qr-code
has caused the Debian Bug report #991239,
regarding unblock: django-qr-code/2.2.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
On 16197 March 1977, Paul Gevers wrote:
Albeit there is some progress, we think it better for the people
involved to now say that we will *not* release on July 31.
Unfortunately, that means that we have to start looking for a new date
again. Assuming what we'll learn in the upcoming week or t
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jul 2021 21:13:10 +0200
with message-id <97d7046a-e338-e1db-0e82-f2a98def8...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#991156: unblock: config-package-dev/5.6 [pre-approval]
has caused the Debian Bug report #991156,
regarding unblock: config-package-dev/5.6 [pre-approval]
to
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org,ond...@debian.org
Hi release team,
Please unblock package php7.4
As we do for stable, php7.4 will follow the upstream versions usually
in DSAs (as long supp
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #986669 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package htslib/1.9-12~deb10u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
986669: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986669
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Fri, 2021-04-09 at 11:46 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> htslib is not built for i386 on buster (due to autopkgtest problems),
> making python-cyvcf2:i386/python3-cyvcf2:i386 uninstallable in buster
> due to their dependency on libhts2:i386.
>
> -11 was the only r
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #986216 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package
dwarf-fortress/0.44.12+dfsg1-0+deb10u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
986216: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986216
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 2021-03-31 at 20:59 +0200, Sven Bartscher wrote:
> It has been noted in #986119 that the upstream release tarballs for
> dwarf-fortress include shared libraries but no corresponding source
> code is available. The shared libraries in question are licensed
> und
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #990182 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package hg-git/0.8.12-1+deb10u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
990182: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990182
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Re-adding pending tag that was removed by re-opening after premature closure
> tags 989530 + pending
Bug #989530 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package mupdf/1.14.0+ds1-4+deb10u3
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Tue, 2021-06-22 at 09:50 +0200, Timo Röhling wrote:
> [ Reason ]
> This update fixes the RC stable bug #933100 (broken test suite) that
> was
> caused by a change in the git command output after the initial upload
> of
> version 0.8.12-1.
>
Please go ahead; sorry
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #990315 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package gcc-mingw-w64/21.3~deb10u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
990315: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990315
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Fri, 2021-06-25 at 15:08 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
>
> Would it be possible to upload the backported fix for gcc-mingw-w64’s
> #989862 to Buster? The debdiff is attached; it’s a minimal, targeted
> fix for gcov support.
>
Please go ahead; sorry for the delay.
R
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sun, 2021-06-27 at 18:10 +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> This is a pre-approval request for feature-check/0.2.2-3+deb10u1 to
> fix the #990276 RC bug already fixed in unstable.
>
> [ Reason ]
> See #990276 (https://bugs.debian.org/990276): Version comparisons may
>
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #990372 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package feature-check/0.2.2-3
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
990372: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990372
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #991120 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package postsrsd/1.5-2+deb10u2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
991120: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991120
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Wed, 2021-07-14 at 22:00 +0200, Oxan van Leeuwen wrote:
> [ Checklist ]
> [x] *all* changes are documented in the d/changelog
> [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
> [x] attach debdiff against the package in (old)stable
> [ ] the issue is verified a
On Sat, 2021-07-17 at 22:25 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> 14 August (day before DebCamp)
> 21 August (last day of DebCamp)
> RT: elbrus
These both look OK.
> 28 August (DebConf)
> RT: elbrus
That's a holiday weekend in the UK; I'll be visiting family and then
the Debian UK BBQ.
> 4 Se
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-qemu-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net
Please unblock package qemu
[ Reason ]
The new qemu release fixes a few security bugs, and fixes one
non-security-related bug which espe
On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 2:35 PM Graham Inggs wrote:
> It looks like you've attached a binary debdiff. We are looking for a
> source debdiff between the version in testing and unstable.
> i.e.
>
> debdiff apertium-apy_0.11.6-1.dsc apertium-apy_0.11.7-2.dsc
Sorry! Attached source diff now.
--
K
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package django-qr-code
[ Reason ]
New upstream release, targeted release fixing 1 bug.
[ Impact ]
this bug is being fixed:
https://github.com/dprog-philippe-docourt/django-qr-code/issues/31
On 18/07/2021 00:24, Donald Norwood wrote:
Hi!
On 7/17/21 4:58 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 10:25:17PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi all,
On 11-07-2021 21:11, Paul Gevers wrote:
With less than three weeks to go until the tentative release date, I
would love to confirm t
Hi Kartik
On Sun, 18 Jul 2021 at 10:48, Kartik Mistry wrote:
> [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing
It looks like you've attached a binary debdiff. We are looking for a
source debdiff between the version in testing and unstable.
i.e.
debdiff apertium-apy_0.11.6-1.dsc apertium-ap
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: kar...@debian.org
Please unblock package apertium-apy
apertium-apy version 0.11.6-1 is broken due incompatibility with
Python-tornado in testing and fails to start (See: RC Bu
On 2021-07-18 13:06:18 +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 3:00 AM Sebastian Ramacher
> wrote:
> [..]
> > Ah, I missed the debdiff due to the other discussion. Please go ahead.
> >
>
> Uploaded, built and installed on all architecures.
Thanks, binNMUs scheduled.
Cheers
>
>
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jul 2021 08:30:53 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock golang-1.15
has caused the Debian Bug report #990825,
regarding [pre-approval] unblock: golang-1.15/1.15.9-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jul 2021 10:22:42 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#991236: unblock: thunderbird/1:78.12.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #991236,
regarding unblock: thunderbird/1:78.12.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 1:29 PM Graham Inggs wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> Hi Kartik
>
> Please see the 'Appropriate changes during Hard and Full Freeze'
> section and the 'Applying for an unblock' section below that in the
> Bullseye Freeze Policy [1]. It is recommended that you use (
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Stig
Please attach a filtered debdiff to this bug. Something like:
filterdiff -x '*/build-aux/*' -x '*/doc/html/*'
varnish-6.5.1-1--6.5.2-1.debdiff >filtered.debdiff
Please also show the command that you end up using, so we can see
which parts were excluded.
Reg
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #991122 [release.debian.org] unblock: varnish/6.5.2-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
991122: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991122
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #991233 [release.debian.org] unblock: apertium-apy/0.11.7-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
991233: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991233
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Kartik
On Sun, 18 Jul 2021 at 08:33, Kartik Mistry wrote:
> Please unblock apertium-apy (0.11.7-2) which will fix #990917
>
> Let me know if any additional information is needed.
Please see the 'Appropriate changes during Hard and Full Freeze'
section and the 'App
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jul 2021 09:22:17 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#991091: unblock: budgie-desktop/10.5.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #991091,
regarding unblock: budgie-desktop/10.5.2-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jul 2021 09:19:45 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#991073: unblock: ganglia-modules-linux/1.3.4-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #991073,
regarding unblock: ganglia-modules-linux/1.3.4-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package thunderbird
There was again a new ESR release of Thunderbird which fixes as usual
some CVEs.
[ Reason ]
These CVEs got fixed by upstream release of 78.11.0 and 78.12
35 matches
Mail list logo
