Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 unblock: ogdi-dfsg/4.1.0+ds-5
Bug #989795 [release.debian.org] unblock: ogdi-dfsg/4.1.0+ds-4 (pre-approval)
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: ogdi-dfsg/4.1.0+ds-5' from 'unblock:
ogdi-dfsg/4.1.0+ds-4 (pre-approval)'.
--
989795: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
Control: retitle -1 unblock: ogdi-dfsg/4.1.0+ds-5
On 6/13/21 10:40 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-06-13 16:47:58 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 6/13/21 3:13 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>>> On 2021-06-13 15:03:18 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
>>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Probably a bit late, but Salvatore just suggested to handle this via PU
instead of security upload.
The attached debdiff for ring fixes CVE-2021-21375 in Buster.
The fix has bee
On 2021-06-13 23:35:40 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 13/06/2021 22.44, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > My goal is to make libgdal20 and libgdal28 co-installable. Adding those
> > Breaks is not enough and is step into the wrong direction.
>
> Thanks for making that clear. I'll think again about
On 13/06/2021 22.44, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
My goal is to make libgdal20 and libgdal28 co-installable. Adding those
Breaks is not enough and is step into the wrong direction.
Thanks for making that clear. I'll think again about libogdi ...
@Seb: could you upload the gdal3-data patch to expe
Your message dated Sun, 13 Jun 2021 21:21:56 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock thunderbird
has caused the Debian Bug report #989787,
regarding unblock: thunderbird/1:78.11.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Processing changes file: base-files_10.3+deb10u10_arm64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_10.3+deb10u10_armel-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_10.3+deb10u10_armhf-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_10.3+deb10u10_mips-buil
Processing changes file: base-files_10.3+deb10u10_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_10.3+deb10u10_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_10.3+deb10u10_s390x.changes
ACCEPT
On 2021-06-13 17:57:46 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 6/13/21 11:32 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > On 2021-06-13 11:14:45 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> >> On 6/13/21 10:58 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> >>> On 13/06/2021 06.45, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 6/12/21 10:2
Your message dated Sun, 13 Jun 2021 20:42:54 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock firmware-sof
has caused the Debian Bug report #989666,
regarding [pre-approval] unblock: firmware-sof/1.7-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Control: reopen -1
On 2021-06-13 16:47:58 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>
> On 6/13/21 3:13 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > On 2021-06-13 15:03:18 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> >> Package: release.debian.org
> >> Severity: normal
> >> User: release.debian...
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #989795 {Done: Sebastian Ramacher }
[release.debian.org] unblock: ogdi-dfsg/4.1.0+ds-4 (pre-approval)
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #989795 to the same values
previously set
--
989795: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #989666 [release.debian.org] [pre-approval] unblock: firmware-sof/1.7-1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
989666: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989666
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
❦ 11 June 2021 21:05 +02, Sebastian Ramacher:
>> > Could you also provide us with a binary debdiff to be sure that these
>> > changes in d/rules have the desired effect?
>>
>> Hello Sebastian,
>>
>> Here it is:
>>
>> [The following lists of changes regard files as
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #989540 [release.debian.org] unblock: git/1:2.32.0-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
989540: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989540
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Jonathan,
On Sun, 6 Jun 2021 15:56:50 -0700 Jonathan Nieder
wrote:
> [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
I hope for you you didn't go over all changes line-by-line:
1089 files changed, 151811 insertions(+), 82910 deletions(-)
You're debdiff was so larg
Processing changes file:
user-mode-linux_4.19-1um-1+deb10u1+b1_amd64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: user-mode-linux_4.19-1um-1+deb10u1+b1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 989797 + pending
Bug #989797 [release.debian.org] RM: sogo-connector -- RoM; incompatible with
current Thundrbird versions
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
989797: https:
On 6/13/21 11:32 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-06-13 11:14:45 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 6/13/21 10:58 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>>> On 13/06/2021 06.45, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 6/12/21 10:23 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> I have unblocked gdal.
>>>
Processing changes file: base-files_10.3+deb10u10_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
docker.io_18.09.1+dfsg1-7.1+deb10u3_armhf-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: docker.io_18.09.1+dfsg1-7.1+deb10u3_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
docker.io_18.09.1+dfsg1-
Processing changes file:
docker.io_18.09.1+dfsg1-7.1+deb10u3_arm64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
docker.io_18.09.1+dfsg1-7.1+deb10u3_armel-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Your message dated Sun, 13 Jun 2021 15:01:39 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock ogdi-dfsg
has caused the Debian Bug report #989795,
regarding unblock: ogdi-dfsg/4.1.0+ds-4 (pre-approval)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #989795 [release.debian.org] unblock: ogdi-dfsg/4.1.0+ds-4 (pre-approval)
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
989795: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989795
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On 6/13/21 3:13 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-06-13 15:03:18 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: unblock
>>
>> Please unblock package ogdi-dfsg
>>
>> [ Rea
Processing changes file:
docker.io_18.09.1+dfsg1-7.1+deb10u3_amd64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk).
> usertags 989797 rm
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: rm.
> retitle 989797 RM: sogo-connector -- RoM;
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # missing debdiff, pinged on IRC
> tags 989569 + moreinfo
Bug #989569 [release.debian.org] unblock: audacity/2.4.2~dfsg0-5
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
989569: https://bug
Your message dated Sun, 13 Jun 2021 13:23:27 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock musescore2
has caused the Debian Bug report #989780,
regarding unblock: musescore2/2.3.2+dfsg4-15 and musescore3/3.2.3+dfsg2-11
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Sun, 13 Jun 2021 15:16:03 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#989796: RM: sogo-connector/68.0.1-2~deb10u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #989796,
regarding RM: sogo-connector/68.0.1-2~deb10u1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sun, 13 Jun 2021 15:14:24 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#989789: RM: sogo-connector/68.0.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #989789,
regarding RM: sogo-connector/68.0.1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Bug #989795 [release.debian.org] unblock: ogdi-dfsg/4.1.0+ds-4 (pre-approval)
Added tag(s) confirmed and moreinfo.
--
989795: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989795
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.or
Processing control commands:
> clone -1 -2
Bug #989789 [release.debian.org] RM: sogo-connector/68.0.1-2
Bug 989789 cloned as bug 989797
> retitle -2 RM: sogo-connector/68.0.1-2~deb10u1
Bug #989797 [release.debian.org] RM: sogo-connector/68.0.1-2
Changed Bug title to 'RM: sogo-connector/68.0.1-2~de
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
On 2021-06-13 15:03:18 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package ogdi-dfsg
>
> [ Reason ]
> It fixes #989790 which should help wit
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: retitle -2 RM: sogo-connector/68.0.1-2~deb10u1
Control: tags -2 buster
On 2021-06-13 09:10:48 +0200, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: rm
>
> Hi,
> please remove the so
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
(explain the reason for the removal here)
--
Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ogdi-dfsg
[ Reason ]
It fixes #989790 which should help with upgrades from 3.2.
[ Impact ]
More troublesome distribution upgrade.
[ Tests ]
N/A
[ Risks ]
Dependenc
Your message dated Sun, 13 Jun 2021 11:03:23 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock polyphone
has caused the Debian Bug report #989779,
regarding unblock: polyphone/2.2.0.20210109+dfsg1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Hi Simon,
On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 17:27:48 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
If you really think another upload is too much hassle, you could
convince us to unblock regardless if you build twice and show with
diffoscope that the compat bump doesn't impact the (binary) packages at all.
I'm not the main
On 2021-06-13 11:30:47 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 6/13/21 11:12 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > On 2021-06-13 10:58:19 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> >> On 13/06/2021 06.45, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> >>> On 6/12/21 10:23 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> I have unblocked g
On 2021-06-13 11:14:45 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 6/13/21 10:58 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > On 13/06/2021 06.45, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> >> On 6/12/21 10:23 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> >>> I have unblocked gdal.
> >>
> >> Thanks, libgdal (3.2.2-1) will need to be unbloc
On 6/13/21 11:12 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-06-13 10:58:19 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> On 13/06/2021 06.45, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> On 6/12/21 10:23 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
I have unblocked gdal.
>>>
>>> Thanks, libgdal (3.2.2-1) will need to be unblocked as w
On 6/13/21 10:58 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 13/06/2021 06.45, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 6/12/21 10:23 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>>> I have unblocked gdal.
>>
>> Thanks, libgdal (3.2.2-1) will need to be unblocked as well, it goes
>
> libgdal-grass ?
Obviously, yes.
>> hand in
Processing changes file: golang-1.11_1.11.6-1+deb10u4_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: golang-1.11_1.11.6-1+deb10u4_all-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: golang-1.11_1.11.6-1+deb10u4_amd64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: golang-1.11_1.11.6-1+deb10u4_a
On 2021-06-13 10:58:19 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 13/06/2021 06.45, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> > On 6/12/21 10:23 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > > I have unblocked gdal.
> >
> > Thanks, libgdal (3.2.2-1) will need to be unblocked as well, it goes
>
> libgdal-grass ?
>
> > hand in
On 13/06/2021 06.45, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 6/12/21 10:23 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
I have unblocked gdal.
Thanks, libgdal (3.2.2-1) will need to be unblocked as well, it goes
libgdal-grass ?
hand in hand with gdal (3.2.2+dfsg-1). libgdal needs the same upstream
version of gda
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi,
please remove the sogo-connector package from testing and stable.
The current version of sogo-connector isn't usable with any recent
version of thunderbird in both releases.
I was hoping ups
46 matches
Mail list logo
