Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package netbase
One port added.
unblock netbase/6.3
--
ciao,
Marco
diff -Nru netbase-6.2/debian/changelog netbase-6.3/debian/changelog
--- netbase-6.2/debian/changelog 202
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package whois
[ Reason ]
Updated the internal databases.
[ Impact ]
Will not work correctly for some domains.
[ Tests ]
No, anybody who cares feel free to contribute some.
On Apr 16, Bastian Blank wrote:
> postfix is easy. Would inn2 be license compliant with a AGPL licensed
> BDB, aka able to provide the source to it's users, or what is the plan
> anyway?
The plan is to continue using 5.3, not upgrading.
> slapd defaults to LMDB since several years and you need
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 - moreinfo
Bug #987015 [release.debian.org] [pre-approval] unblock: python-apt/2.2.0
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
987015: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987015
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 06:54:32PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 06:28:49PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> > X-D
Hi Marco
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 05:04:03PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 15, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > After this time we really should try to get rid of this package, which
> > even is NMU maintained since three years.
> I am not persuaded. I maintain libberkeleydb-perl and it works fine,
Hi Gerardo
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 10:30:08AM +0200, Gerardo Ballabio wrote:
> Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Berkeley DB was relicensed to AGPLv3 almost eight years ago.
> Sorry but I don't understand, why is that a problem?
> I believe the AGPL (you mean the GNU Affero General Public License,
> right?
Hi,
On 16-04-2021 00:07, Hubert Chathi wrote:
> Again, this needs to go through tpu since sid has a newer version
Please read our FAQ [1]. We prefer you revert the newer version and
prepare a targeted fix in unstable. The tpu route is only available if a
package is stuck behind something else tha
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: z...@debian.org
Please unblock package golang-gopkg-yaml.v3
[ Reason ]
Fix FTBFS on 32 bit arch
[ Impact ]
The package FTBFS on 32 bit arch.
And packages that build-dep on it
On Apr 15, Bastian Blank wrote:
> After this time we really should try to get rid of this package, which
> even is NMU maintained since three years.
I am not persuaded. I maintain libberkeleydb-perl and it works fine, it
is mature software.
But even if we agree that all the libdb5.3 reverse dep
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 986915 - moreinfo
Bug #986915 [release.debian.org] unblock: pexpect/4.8.0-2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
986915: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
On 2021-04-14 08:08:35 +, Gordon Ball wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package pexpect
>
> (not yet uploaded to unstable)
ACK, please remove the m
Please look at the second email in the bug, it's attached there.
(Sorry for layout, writing this on phone)
Sebastian Ramacher schrieb am Fr., 16. Apr. 2021,
14:16:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> On 2021-04-15 18:28:49 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severi
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Bug #986915 [release.debian.org] unblock: pexpect/4.8.0-2
Added tag(s) confirmed and moreinfo.
--
986915: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986915
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #987015 [release.debian.org] [pre-approval] unblock: python-apt/2.2.0
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
987015: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987015
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2021-04-15 18:28:49 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@debian.org
>
> Please unblock package python-apt
>
> [ Reason ]
>
> Want to
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 2021-04-15 20:13:34 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 03:04:42 +0530 Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-r...@lis
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #986742 [release.debian.org] unblock: ruby2.7/2.7.3-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
986742: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986742
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Fri, 16 Apr 2021 12:11:07 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock node-glob-parent
has caused the Debian Bug report #987047,
regarding unblock: node-glob-parent/5.1.1+~5.1.0-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Fri, 16 Apr 2021 12:09:26 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock biosig
has caused the Debian Bug report #987027,
regarding unblock: biosig/2.1.2-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Fri, 16 Apr 2021 12:07:35 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock node-handlebars
has caused the Debian Bug report #987041,
regarding unblock: node-handlebars/4.7.6+~4.1.0-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
[ Reason ]
node-glob-parent is vulnerable to Regex Denial of Service (ReDoS)
CVE-2020-28469
[ Impact ]
Low vulnerability risk
[ Tests ]
No test backported from 5.1.0 branch
[ Risk
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package node-glob-parent
[ Reason ]
node-glob-parent is vulnerable to Regex Denial of Service (ReDoS),
CVE-2020-28469
[ Impact ]
Medium vulnerability
[ Tests ]
Test passed
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
adequate reports symbol-size-mismatch for a few packages, these should
be fixable with binNMUs:
nmu tcpreplay_4.3.3-2 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild to update symbol size for
pcap_version."
Your message dated Fri, 16 Apr 2021 08:45:45 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock workrave
has caused the Debian Bug report #987028,
regarding unblock: workrave/1.10.44-7.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: utka...@debian.org
[ Reason ]
node-handlebars is vulnerable to Arbitrary Code Execution and Remote
Code Execution (CVE-2019-20920 and CVE-2021-23369)
[ Impact ]
Medium
Bastian Blank wrote:
> Berkeley DB was relicensed to AGPLv3 almost eight years ago.
Sorry but I don't understand, why is that a problem?
I believe the AGPL (you mean the GNU Affero General Public License,
right?) is a free license. Is it not?
Gerardo
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package node-handlebars
[ Reason ]
node-handlebars is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE)
(CVE-2021-23369).
[ Impact ]
Medium vulnerability
[ Tests ]
Yes, code passed
Hi,
On 15.04.21 18:12, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi
>
> I would like to propose a release goal:
>
> Remove Berkeley DB (finally)
>
> Berkeley DB was relicensed to AGPLv3 almost eight years ago. Since
> then, Debian stayed with the last version
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-javascript-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
[ Reason ]
dojo/dijit is vulnerable to cross-site-scripting (#97,
CVE-2020-4051).
[ Impact ]
Medium vulnerability
[ T
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Tags: buster
Severity: normal
This is an update from ClamAV from 0.102.4 to 0.103.2. The 103 release
was in unstable since the beginning. I skipped it for Buster back then
because the 102 based release recevied a
31 matches
Mail list logo
