Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: haavard_aa...@yahoo.no
These are the same changes which was implemented in stretch, two
upstream patches. Both of these patches resolves a path traversal flaw,
which w
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package python-hdf5storage
[ Reason ]
Upstream has identified the problem affecting random failure of tests
reported in RC Bug#971806. It was in a random number used to lab
Hi Bernd,
On 17-02-2021 22:30, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-02-17 at 18:37 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> libvirt-python is a key package.
>
> and it should match libvirt. Having libvirt-python 6.x and libvirt 7.0
> is (imho, ymmv...) much worse than an completely (from us) untested
> libvir
Hi Paul,
On Wed, 2021-02-17 at 18:37 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> libvirt-python is a key package.
and it should match libvirt. Having libvirt-python 6.x and libvirt 7.0
is (imho, ymmv...) much worse than an completely (from us) untested
libvirt-python.
Thanks,
Bernd
--
Bernd Zeimetz
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #982949 [release.debian.org] Please allow libvirt-python 7.0.0 into bullseye
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
982949: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=982949
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Guido,
On 17-02-2021 08:50, Guido Günther wrote:
> #982695 made me aware i totally forgot to update libvirt-python with
> recent libvirt before the freeze, hence the build failure. I've
> prepared 7.0.0-1 in experimental a couple of days ago and it would be
> great to
6 matches
Mail list logo
