Processing changes file: base-files_10.3+deb10u8_amd64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_10.3+deb10u8_arm64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_10.3+deb10u8_armel-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_10.3+deb10u8_armhf-buildd.
On Monday, 1 February 2021 8:07:36 AM AEDT Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Have you considered keeping your NFS share with the OCI images,
> but using a registry just for distribution to your cluster?
> This way your registry is basically just a cache.
All the down sides and no benefits. Space creep wou
Processing changes file: postsrsd_1.5-2+deb10u1_arm64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: postsrsd_1.5-2+deb10u1_armel-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: postsrsd_1.5-2+deb10u1_armhf-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: postsrsd_1.5-2+deb10u1_i386.changes
AC
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 10:33 PM Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
>
> > > No it hasn't... :( There is a serious regression:
> > > https://github.com/hashicorp/nomad-driver-podman/issues/69
> >
> > I'm having a hard time considering this a "serious" regression. The
> problem
> > as far as I understand is t
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 - moreinfo
Bug #981232 [release.debian.org] unblock: perl/5.32.1-1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
981232: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=981232
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 11:00:16AM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
>
> Thanks. Looks like all those failures went away, except
> libtest-valgrind-perl. I cannot reproduce that ppc64el failure on
> plummer.debian.org (though it's a bit hard to simulate the exact
> autopkgtest co
Processing changes file: base-files_10.3+deb10u8_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: postsrsd_1.5-2+deb10u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #977782 {Done: Oxan van Leeuwen }
[release.debian.org] buster-pu: package postsrsd/1.5-2
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longe
Control: reopen -1
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sun, 2021-01-31 at 19:02 +, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> postsrsd (1.5-2+deb10u1) buster; urgency=medium
> .
>* CVE-2020-35573: Ensure timestamp tags aren't too long before
> trying to
> decode them, to protect against a potential deni
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jan 2021 19:02:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#977782: fixed in postsrsd 1.5-2+deb10u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #977782,
regarding buster-pu: package postsrsd/1.5-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
package release.debian.org
tags 977782 = buster pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian buster.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: postsrsd
Version: 1.5-2+deb10u1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> tags 977782 = buster pending
Bug #977782 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: pac
Hi,
It might be the time to resume the discussion...
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 2:09 AM Ansgar wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Clément Hermann writes:
> > The original message on debian-go and debian-release is here:
> >
> > https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/176455fa-4611-f2c1-9ca1-f855d7d99...@debian.org
>
Processing changes file: firefox-esr_78.7.0esr-1~deb10u1_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: firefox-esr_78.7.0esr-1~deb10u1_all.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: firefox-esr_78.7.0esr-1~deb10u1_amd64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: firefox-esr_78.7.0esr-1~deb1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi RMs,
There are two SSL related bugs in fetchmail that affect Buster. The
first cause is that otherwise working SSL connections fail sometimes
[1]. The fix is in 6.4.0~rc1 and in
On 31/01/21 11:08, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Oxan,
>
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 09:58:23PM +0100, Oxan van Leeuwen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 30-01-2021 21:27, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > I noticed that today there was an upload to security-master for it.
> > > Given our previous discuss
Hi Oxan,
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 09:58:23PM +0100, Oxan van Leeuwen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 30-01-2021 21:27, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > I noticed that today there was an upload to security-master for it.
> > Given our previous discussion, was this an oversight? I just have
> > rejected the pack
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 07:39:36PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> I pressed retry a bunch of times.
Thanks. Looks like all those failures went away, except
libtest-valgrind-perl. I cannot reproduce that ppc64el failure on
plummer.debian.org (though it's a bit hard to simulate the exact
autopk
On Sunday, 31 January 2021 7:29:16 PM AEDT Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> I do run a private registry with my CI, many images are pushed and
> deleted daliy. But I haven't noticed disk space leaks.
Upstream have many bugs about that... Here are just a few (I've seen more
of those...):
https://github.co
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 11:33 AM Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
[...]
> Do you have experience operating local container registry??
> I have and I can tell that it is not fun, to say the least. Docker registry
> leaks disk space because it does not garbage collect some images...
Is there a known bug numbe
Processing changes file: wireshark_2.6.20-0+deb10u1_mipsel-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
22 matches
Mail list logo
