Processing changes file: gnutls28_3.6.7-4+deb10u6_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gnutls28_3.6.7-4+deb10u6_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gnutls28_3.6.7-4+deb10u6_armhf-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear Release Team,
I intend to fix https://bugs.debian.org/973442 in Buster. Under some
circumstances, the user input will cause an infinite loop in libcjson
library. This is a reg
Adam D. Barratt (2021-01-16):
> Please could you confirm your availability, and any preferences, for
> the following:
>
> - January 30th (would mean we would have to freeze next weekend, so
> a bit tight)
> - February 6th
>
> My personal preference would be the 6th.
Me too. But I can do both
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
[ Reason ]
The /etc/cron.daily/cyrus-imapd cron script is not executed because the
Cyrus version check does not match the cyrus version installed on Debian
Buster
[ Impact ]
Dala lo
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 07:58:10PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Thinking about it, security-wise it might be better. Microsoft will
> support the security backports to EOL versions of PHP 7.x, but they
> announced they won’t do it for PHP 8.x, so we are (maybe) bit more
> covered with PHP 7.4.
Processing changes file: chromium_87.0.4280.141-0.1~deb10u1_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: chromium_87.0.4280.141-0.1~deb10u1_all.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: chromium_87.0.4280.141-0.1~deb10u1_amd64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: chromium_87.0.4280.
On Fri, 2021-01-15 at 18:48 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Jan 2021 22:09:07 +0800 Shengjing Zhu
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 9:59 PM Adam D. Barratt <
> > a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2021-01-02 at 19:53 +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jan 2, 2021
Am Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 07:58:10PM +0100 schrieb Ondřej Surý:
> Thinking about it, security-wise it might be better. Microsoft will support
> the security backports to EOL versions of PHP 7.x, but they announced they
> won’t do it for PHP 8.x, so we are (maybe) bit more covered with PHP 7.4.
Eve
Hi,
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you.
On Tue, 2020-12-15 at 23:36 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Collect selected changes from unstable, in particular:
> * Avoid redirecting stderr by default, which interferes with
> upstream's
> usual support/diagnostic process
> * Add missing depend
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 09:13:49PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2021-01-14 19:03:37 [+0100], Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > Do you have pointers to upstream issues?
> >
> > There are a whole bunch of other issues and pull requests related to
> > this. I hope this is the end of the regres
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> forcemerge 977028 941571
Bug #977028 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: p
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #977028 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package sane-backends/1.0.27-3.2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
977028: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=977028
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Thu, 2020-12-10 at 09:44 +0100, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> The udev rule to change the owner/group of usb scanners are not
> included.
>
> [ Impact ]
> Scanner working only as root
>
> [ Risks ]
> Trivial. The same rule are included in older sane-backends releases
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #977511 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package
edk2/0~20181115.85588389-3+deb10u2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
977511: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=977511
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pro
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Tue, 2020-12-15 at 14:53 -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> Address CVE-2019-14584 (#977300), for which the security team has
> declined to
> release a DSA.
>
Sorry for the delay. Please go ahead.
Regards,
Adam
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #979724 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package libmaxminddb/1.3.2-1+deb10u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
979724: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=979724
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sat, 2020-12-19 at 20:53 +0100, Xavier Guimard wrote:
> node-ini is vulnearable to CVE-2020-7788: if an attacker submits a
> malicious
> INI file to an application that parses it with ini.parse, they will
> pollute
> the prototype on the application. This can be exp
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #977735 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package node-ini/1.3.5-1+deb10u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
977735: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=977735
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sun, 2021-01-10 at 21:39 +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> This is an buster proposed update to fix CVE-2020-28241:
> > libmaxminddb before 1.4.3 has a heap-based buffer over-read in
> > dump_entry_data_list in maxminddb.c.
>
> The security team has marked the CVE a
On Sun, 2021-01-10 at 20:08 -0600, Rob Browning wrote:
> dkg has requested that we consider fixing this bug in buster:
>
> Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/919642
> Upstream: https://debbugs.gnu.org/34121
>
> which is fairly straightforward (just the new patch at the end,
> cherry-picked direc
Hi
El 16 de enero de 2021 15:38:13 CET, "Adam D. Barratt"
escribió:
>Hi,
>
>It's that time again, when we should get 10.8 out.
>
>Please could you confirm your availability, and any preferences, for
>the following:
>
>- January 30th (would mean we would have to freeze next weekend, so a
>bit tig
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 02:38:13PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's that time again, when we should get 10.8 out.
>
> Please could you confirm your availability, and any preferences, for
> the following:
>
> - January 30th (would mean we would have to freeze next weekend, so a
> bit
On Mon, 2021-01-11 at 15:57 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Adam D. Barratt (2020-12-31):
> > Sorry for the delay in picking this back up.
>
> Same here.
>
> > As grub produces udebs, this will need a KiBi-ack, so tagging and
> > CCing accordingly.
>
> If I'm getting this right, the ud
Hey Adam,
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 02:38:13PM +, Adam Barratt wrote:
>Hi,
>
>It's that time again, when we should get 10.8 out.
>
>Please could you confirm your availability, and any preferences, for
>the following:
>
>- January 30th (would mean we would have to freeze next weekend, so a
>bit t
Hi,
It's that time again, when we should get 10.8 out.
Please could you confirm your availability, and any preferences, for
the following:
- January 30th (would mean we would have to freeze next weekend, so a
bit tight)
- February 6th
My personal preference would be the 6th.
Cheers,
Adam
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jan 2021 09:19:51 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#979084: transition: hamlib
has caused the Debian Bug report #979084,
regarding transition: hamlib
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Sat, 16 Jan 2021 09:19:27 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#979185: transition: muparserx
has caused the Debian Bug report #979185,
regarding transition: muparserx
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
29 matches
Mail list logo
