Bug#976811: transition: php8.0

2020-12-11 Thread Ondřej Surý
And let me restate that it’s not my intent to make anyone’s life hell and I am willing to help with any package (as usual). I am just trying to do the most sane thing to do security and maintainer wise. Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý (He/Him) ond...@sury.org > On 12. 12. 2020, at 0:22, Holger Levsen wrot

Bug#977172: buster-pu: package qxmpp/1.0.0-4+deb10u1

2020-12-11 Thread Boris Pek
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: buster User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Dear release team, I would like to push a fix for potential SEGFAULT on connection error in qxmpp library. Proposed patch is well tested in Debian unstable since qxmpp/1.0.0-5. De

Re: Porter roll call for Debian Bullseye

2020-12-11 Thread Wookey
On 2020-11-02 22:23 +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: > Hi > > We are doing a roll call for porters of all release architectures. If > you are an active porter behind one of the release architectures [1] > for the entire lifetime of Debian Bullseye (est. end of 2024), please > respond with a signed emai

Bug#976811: transition: php8.0

2020-12-11 Thread Holger Levsen
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 07:58:06PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: > And done, and uploaded. yay, thank you! -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C ⠈⠳⣄ signatu

Bug#976811: transition: php8.0

2020-12-11 Thread Ondřej Surý
And done, and uploaded. -- Ondřej Surý (He/Him) > On 11. 12. 2020, at 19:52, Holger Levsen wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 07:43:00PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: >> Sorry, I was on my phone and missed that. Yes, I can do that. > > :) & thank you! > > > -- > cheers, >Holger > > ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶

Bug#976811: transition: php8.0

2020-12-11 Thread Holger Levsen
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 07:43:00PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: > Sorry, I was on my phone and missed that. Yes, I can do that. :) & thank you! -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 F

Bug#976811: transition: php8.0

2020-12-11 Thread Ondřej Surý
Sorry, I was on my phone and missed that. Yes, I can do that. On Fri 11. 12. 2020 at 19:42 Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi Ondřej, > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 06:01:31PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: > > I think the transition is worth the trouble. Having official security > support is important especiall

Bug#976811: transition: php8.0

2020-12-11 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Ondřej, On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 06:01:31PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: > I think the transition is worth the trouble. Having official security support > is important especially for PHP. as a comment from the sideline... > > On 11. 12. 2020, at 17:38, David Prévot wrote: > > That said, it wou

Re: slurm-wlm transition to testing

2020-12-11 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 11-12-2020 09:14, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2020-12-11 02:03:40 +0100, Gennaro Oliva wrote: >> the autopkgtest for the slurm-wlm package is failing on ppc64el because >> mariadb is not starting in the autopkgtest environment as you can see >> here: >> >> https://ci.debian.net/data/auto

Bug#976811: transition: php8.0

2020-12-11 Thread David Prévot
Hi Ondřej, Le Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:28:38AM +0100, Ondřej Surý a écrit : > I would like to transition the PHP to version 8.0; The timing of this request makes me uneasy: php8.0 has been in Debian for less than a week, and we are a month away from the transition freeze. > it's not such a huge

Bug#976811: transition: php8.0

2020-12-11 Thread Ondřej Surý
The main problem is the PHP release schedule: https://www.php.net/supported-versions.php If we release with PHP 7.4, the upstream security support will end sooner than security support for Debian bullseye. If we release with PHP 8.0 we will have full three years of upstream support. There’s st

Re: slurm-wlm transition to testing

2020-12-11 Thread Gennaro Oliva
Hi Sebastian, On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 09:14:22AM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > The issue here is the source package rename. slurm-wlm took over all > binary packages from slurm-llnl. In this case, britney scheduled tests > for slurm-llnl with the binary packages built from slurm-wlm. I don't

Re: slurm-wlm transition to testing

2020-12-11 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi Gennaro On 2020-12-11 02:03:40 +0100, Gennaro Oliva wrote: > Hi team, > > the autopkgtest for the slurm-wlm package is failing on ppc64el because > mariadb is not starting in the autopkgtest environment as you can see > here: > > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/ppc64el/s/slurm-