Bug#976352: transition: libjsoncpp

2020-12-08 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello, On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 23:13:07 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: forwarded -1 > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libjsoncpp.html > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On 2020-12-08 23:04:05 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > Hello again > > > > polybar is now ok

Bug#973480: marked as done (transition: llvm-defaults)

2020-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 8 Dec 2020 23:17:57 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#973480: transition: llvm-defaults has caused the Debian Bug report #973480, regarding transition: llvm-defaults to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#976700: marked as done (transition: wireshark ( late notice :-( ))

2020-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 8 Dec 2020 23:16:14 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#976700: transition: wireshark ( late notice :-( ) has caused the Debian Bug report #976700, regarding transition: wireshark ( late notice :-( ) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#976352: transition: libjsoncpp

2020-12-08 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libjsoncpp.html Control: tags -1 + confirmed On 2020-12-08 23:04:05 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hello again > > polybar is now ok too, because of the xcb-proto fix > > remaining failures are down to 4, only one wit

Processed: Re: Bug#976352: transition: libjsoncpp

2020-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libjsoncpp.html Bug #976352 [release.debian.org] transition: libjsoncpp Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libjsoncpp.html'. > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #97635

Bug#976352: transition: libjsoncpp

2020-12-08 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello again polybar is now ok too, because of the xcb-proto fix remaining failures are down to 4, only one without patch and one out from testing. kopanocore fail (unrelated: #969297) libseqlib fail (#976414) forwarded upstream that might be easily patchable spring

Processed: tagging 945592

2020-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # maintainer has followed up with new debdiff > tags 945592 - moreinfo Bug #945592 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package horizon/3:14.0.2-3 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Bug#976880: transition: dtkcore

2020-12-08 Thread Arun Kumar Pariyar
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, Please schedule a transition slot for dtkcore, the new version of dtkcore is uploaded to experimental. Also, I'd like to mention that dtkwidget has SONAME change. Ben

Re: Release status of i386 for Bullseye and long term support for 3 years?

2020-12-08 Thread Simon McVittie
(Please cc me, I'm not subscribed.) Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > Having participated in the current discussion about 32 bit releases and > lifetimes in Linux Weekly News (lwn.net) - what's the status of i386 for the > lifetime of Bullseye? > > There seems to be only one maintainer. > > Is i386 going

Bug#971571: transition: libgit2

2020-12-08 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2020-12-08 16:58:46 +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 3:30 PM Sebastian Ramacher > wrote: > > v30 was accepted. Please perform a source-only upload for the arch: all > > packages. > > That should be done now! \o/ > > > > The only reverse-{,build-}depende

Bug#971571: transition: libgit2

2020-12-08 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 11:00:40 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Filed #976820 against gitaly. I will follow it up with upstream. > In any case, I'll remove golang-gopkg-libgit2-git2go.v28 and > gitaly from testing to unblock this transition. gitaly is blocked by > ruby-faraday which is currently

Bug#971571: transition: libgit2

2020-12-08 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi Sebastian, On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 3:30 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > v30 was accepted. Please perform a source-only upload for the arch: all > packages. That should be done now! \o/ > > The only reverse-{,build-}dependency is gitaly, it seems. So I'm CCing > > Praveen so he gets a heads up.

Bug#973600: transition: gdal

2020-12-08 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2020-12-07 12:30:10 +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 12/6/20 12:37 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > On 2020-11-02 12:49:04 +0100, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > >> Package: release.debian.org > >> Severity: normal > >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > >> Usertags: transition > >>

Bug#970884: marked as done (transition: Evolution 3.38)

2020-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 8 Dec 2020 11:50:48 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#970884: transition: Evolution 3.38 has caused the Debian Bug report #970884, regarding transition: Evolution 3.38 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Processed: Re: Bug#976386: transition: octave

2020-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #976386 [release.debian.org] transition: octave Added tag(s) confirmed. > forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/octave-6.html Bug #976386 [release.debian.org] transition: octave Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://rele

Bug#976386: transition: octave

2020-12-08 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 + confirmed Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/octave-6.html On 2020-12-04 13:32:04 +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > Control: blo

Bug#971571: transition: libgit2

2020-12-08 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2020-12-07 14:14:50 +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 11:06 AM peter green wrote: > > In addition to the packages mentioned here, it seems there is another > > package involved: golang-gopkg-libgit2-git2go.v28 . It only builds > > arch-all packages and does not

Bug#976811: transition: php8.0

2020-12-08 Thread Ondřej Surý
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, I would like to transition the PHP to version 8.0; it's not such a huge bump as it was with 5.6 -> 7.0 and most of the packages that

Bug#973600: transition: gdal

2020-12-08 Thread Graham Inggs
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 09:49, Graham Inggs wrote: > I'll test and upload if successful. Ah, built successfully on arm64, failed on armhf. :( What Adrian wrote in #976802 sounds promising: "Since the new r-cran-sf build dependency seems to be only required for tests, removing it (also from the au