On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 06:56:56PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 07:27:52PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
>
> ...
>
> >Rationales:
> >
> >
> >1. You can start optionally build-depending on stuff available
> > only on some architectures, without having to use arch
Hi,
Quoting Julian Andres Klode (2020-07-16 19:27:52)
> Rationales:
>
>
> 1. You can start optionally build-depending on stuff available
>only on some architectures, without having to use arch restriction
>lists.
>
>Arch restriction lists are tediuous, especially also because in
>
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 07:27:52PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
...
>Rationales:
>
>
>1. You can start optionally build-depending on stuff available
> only on some architectures, without having to use arch restriction
> lists.
>
> Arch restriction lists are tediuous, especially also
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 07:27:52PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Not liked proposals:
>
> Build-Depends-Optional field - it would just be ignored by tools,
> silently, and we'd find about it onyl when it is too late.
>
> Build-Recommends field - same as previous, but also the semantic
Hi,
we were just talking in #debian-dpkg about optional build-deps. guillem
believes that the release team is in the best position to specify if this
is reasonable or not, so here we go:
We have came up with a syntax, one goal being to break parsers and not
silently ignore optional deps:
Build
Your message dated Thu, 16 Jul 2020 18:57:52 +0200
with message-id <20200716165752.ga3225...@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#965134: nmu: gazebo_11.0.0+dfsg1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #965134,
regarding nmu: gazebo_11.0.0+dfsg1-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Hi,
On Thu, 16 Jul 2020, at 01:27, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi Andrej,
>
> Andrej Shadura (2020-05-03):
> > I’m proposing to upload an upstream patch fixing an index corruption
> > in borgbackup leading to a data loss, see #953615.
>
> I know stretch is about to get archived, but I was wonderin
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
as discussed in #963247 I've changed the provided shlibs of
ignition-msgs to include the protobuf version. Can you please binNMU the
reverse dependencies so they pick it up?
nmu gazebo_
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi Release team,
I would like to transition pcl to unstable. The Ben file is fine,
ros-perception-pcl compiles against the new version and I will upload a
fixed python-pcl version during
package: release.debian.org
thanks
Dear release team,
Below follows a debdiff betwewn calamares-settings-debian
10.0.20-1+deb10u1 and 10.0.20-1+deb10u3, which fixes #934503, #934504
and #959541.
"""
diff -Nru calamares-settings-debian-10.0.20/debian/changelog
calamares-settings-debian-10.0.20/de
package: release.debian.org
thanks
Dear release team, below is a debdiff to fix bug #940165 for
speedtest-cli in buster:
"""
diff -Nru speedtest-cli-2.0.2/debian/changelog
speedtest-cli-2.0.2/debian/changelog
--- speedtest-cli-2.0.2/debian/changelog2018-06-15 13:52:44.0
+0200
+++
Hi Andrius
On 2020-07-16 09:35:59, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> Hello,
>
> I want to request binNMU on amd64 for recently accepted new packages, as
> they are not migrated to testing d
12 matches
Mail list logo
