Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hello,
I want to request binNMU on amd64 for recently accepted new packages, as
they are not migrated to testing due to missing builds on buildd.
nmu wannier90_3.1.0+ds-2 . amd64 . unstab
Hi Andrej,
Andrej Shadura (2020-05-03):
> I’m proposing to upload an upstream patch fixing an index corruption
> in borgbackup leading to a data loss, see #953615.
I know stretch is about to get archived, but I was wondering whether it
would make sense to upload either 1.1.9-2~bpo9+2 or 1.1.9-2+
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 961195 with 965073
Bug #961195 [release.debian.org] transition: glibc
961195 was blocked by: 964227 964226 964220 964225 955368 964231 964223 964229
961195 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 961195: 965073
> thanks
Stopping
On Wed, 2020-07-15 at 10:23 +0100, Tim Small wrote:
> What would the procedure be for getting Debian to adopt a similar
> policy with Ceph as it does with Chromium, Firefox, Thunderbird?
[...]
> My assumption is that the Debian Release team don't fully review
> every diff for Firefox or Chromium si
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Packages build ok with the libgc from experimental, except for guile. Filed
patches to fix the guile builds with make 4.3, however guile-2.0 fails tests on
amd64. guile-2.0 could be remo
Hello,
What would the procedure be for getting Debian to adopt a similar policy
with Ceph as it does with Chromium, Firefox, Thunderbird?
As a user of Ceph on Debian, it's disappointing that I should basically
ignore the Ceph packages in Debian because they cannot provide the same
stability/relia
6 matches
Mail list logo
