Bug#964986: buster-pu: package ksh/93u+20120801-3.4

2020-07-13 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Anuradha, [disclaimer: not a member of the release team, so not an authoritative reply] On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 06:56:27PM -0400, Anuradha Weeraman wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: buster > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > X-Debbugs-C

Bug#964986: buster-pu: package ksh/93u+20120801-3.4

2020-07-13 Thread Anuradha Weeraman
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: buster User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: anura...@debian.org, car...@debian.org [ Reason ] Summary of the issue: In ksh version 20120801, a flaw was found in the way it evaluates certain environment variables.

Bug#964482: marked as done (buster-pu: package xen/4.11.4+24-gddaaccbbab-1~deb10u1)

2020-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jul 2020 00:41:47 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#964482: buster-pu: xen/4.11.4+24-gddaaccbbab-1~deb10u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #964482, regarding buster-pu: package xen/4.11.4+24-gddaaccbbab-1~deb10u1 to be marked as done. This means that you c

NEW changes in oldstable-new

2020-07-13 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: debian-installer-netboot-images_20170615+deb9u9_all.changes ACCEPT

Re: Arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concerns

2020-07-13 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
Paul Gevers wrote: > As part of the interim architecture qualification for bullseye, we > request that DSA, the security team, Wanna build, and the toolchain > maintainers review and update their list of known concerns for bullseye > release architectures. There's nothing really of concern from th

Bug#961195: transition: glibc

2020-07-13 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2020-07-13 20:43, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > Hi Aurelien, > > On 13/07/2020 19:54, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > On 2020-07-11 18:09, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >> block 961195 with 955368 964223 964225 964226 964220 964227 964229 964231 > >> thanks > > >

Processed: Re: Bug#961195: transition: glibc

2020-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #961195 [release.debian.org] transition: glibc Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 961195: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=961195 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#961195: transition: glibc

2020-07-13 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi Aurelien, On 13/07/2020 19:54, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2020-07-11 18:09, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> block 961195 with 955368 964223 964225 964226 964220 964227 964229 964231 >> thanks > > Does it mean that we need to have those bugs fixed before starting th

Bug#961195: transition: glibc

2020-07-13 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2020-07-11 18:09, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > block 961195 with 955368 964223 964225 964226 964220 964227 964229 964231 > thanks Does it mean that we need to have those bugs fixed before starting the transition? Or can we start the transition and fix them at the same time? Beside busybox,

NEW changes in oldstable-new

2020-07-13 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: debian-installer-netboot-images_20170615+deb9u9_source.changes ACCEPT