Processing changes file: debian-installer_20190702+deb10u4_mipsel-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
debian-installer_20190702+deb10u4_mips64el-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20190702+deb10u4_amd64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20190702+deb10u4_armel-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20190702+deb10u4_armhf-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20190702+deb10u4_arm64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20190702+deb10u4_s390x-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20190702+deb10u4_source.changes
ACCEPT
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 06:33:26PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > I think in this case it’s okay because of this NEWS entry:
> >
> > https://sources.debian.org/src/matrix-synapse/0.99.2-6/debian/NEWS/
> I'm not sure how that makes it any better? NEWS is shown on upgrade at
> best, so anyone in
Le 04/05/2020 à 18:53, Mattia Rizzolo a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> let me reply before adsb has a chance ;)
>
> On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 02:24:20PM +0200, Xavier wrote:
>> Finally I found a way to fix CVE and keep autopkgtest OK
>> (node-markdown-it-html5-embed). Here is a debdiff for a future point releas
Your message dated Mon, 4 May 2020 21:40:21 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#946779: buster-pu: package logrotate/3.14.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #946779,
regarding buster-pu: package logrotate/3.14.0-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Hi,
let me reply before adsb has a chance ;)
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 02:24:20PM +0200, Xavier wrote:
> Finally I found a way to fix CVE and keep autopkgtest OK
> (node-markdown-it-html5-embed). Here is a debdiff for a future point release
This is good, however,
> diff --git a/debian/changelog b
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 18:30:23 +0200, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 03:35:25PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 03:30:53PM +0200, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> > > Synapse 0.99 was never meant to be a properly usable release in buster,
> > > and it was only in
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 03:35:25PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 03:30:53PM +0200, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> > Synapse 0.99 was never meant to be a properly usable release in buster,
> > and it was only included as some sort of a plug to make upgrades a tiny
> > bit easier fo
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 03:30:53PM +0200, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> Synapse 0.99 was never meant to be a properly usable release in buster,
> and it was only included as some sort of a plug to make upgrades a tiny
> bit easier for users — they were supposed to upgrade the package to the
> version fro
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Synapse 0.99 was never meant to be a properly usable release in buster,
and it was only included as some sort of a plug to make upgrades a ti
On 4 May 2020 at 09:27, Graham Inggs wrote:
| Control: tags -1 + confirmed
|
| Hi Dirk
|
| On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 21:33, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > GNU GSL 2.6 was release last fall; the package is stable and does not move
| > too much upstream. It has been in 'auto transition' for a while
Le 04/05/2020 à 11:54, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> On Mon, 2020-05-04 at 11:36 +0200, Xavier wrote:
>> Le 02/05/2020 à 11:58, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
>>> On Sat, 2020-04-25 at 21:30 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi Xavier,
On Sat, 8 Feb 2020 08:23:25 +0100 Xavier wrote:
> Le 07/02
Le 04/05/2020 à 11:54, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> On Mon, 2020-05-04 at 11:36 +0200, Xavier wrote:
>> Le 02/05/2020 à 11:58, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
>>> On Sat, 2020-04-25 at 21:30 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi Xavier,
On Sat, 8 Feb 2020 08:23:25 +0100 Xavier wrote:
> Le 07/02
On Mon, 2020-05-04 at 11:36 +0200, Xavier wrote:
> Le 02/05/2020 à 11:58, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> > On Sat, 2020-04-25 at 21:30 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > > Hi Xavier,
> > >
> > > On Sat, 8 Feb 2020 08:23:25 +0100 Xavier wrote:
> > > > Le 07/02/2020 à 20:16, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> > >
Le 02/05/2020 à 11:58, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> On Sat, 2020-04-25 at 21:30 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Hi Xavier,
>>
>> On Sat, 8 Feb 2020 08:23:25 +0100 Xavier wrote:
>>> Le 07/02/2020 à 20:16, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
On Sat, 2020-01-25 at 20:40 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
This
Processing changes file: pango1.0_1.42.4-8~deb10u1_all.changes
ACCEPT
On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 09:02:11PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Alright, then I recommend this:
> > reassign 958841 src:erlang 1:22.3.2+dfsg-1
> > clone 958841 -1
> > reassign -1 src:elixir-lang 1.9.1.dfsg-1.3
> > retitle -1 elixir-lang: incompatible with erlang 22
> > # consid
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
Hi Dirk
On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 21:33, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> GNU GSL 2.6 was release last fall; the package is stable and does not move
> too much upstream. It has been in 'auto transition' for a while following my
> initial upload to experimental. Could we may
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #959133 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: Transition for gsl
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
959133: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=959133
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
22 matches
Mail list logo
