Hi Paul,
On 2020-04-05 07:35, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 04-04-2020 23:42, Christian Kastner wrote:
>> Can and will do so with a patch (as I'm already handled the very
>> same issue with src:scikit-learn)
I just filed #956069 with normal severity, and excluding the tests on
all platforms (not just
I'm about to release qpdf 10. Someone contributed an openssl crypto provider.
Do you think I should build with the qpdf packages for debian with 1) only
gnutls, 2) only openssl, or 3) both gnutls and openssl? Option 3 allows users
to select at runtime but makes qpdf dependent on both packages. I
Adam D. Barratt (2020-04-06):
> I realise things are a little unusual right now, but it's about time
> that we started looking at dates for 10.4.
>
> I guess the biggest impact of current circumstances on the process is
> likely to be around image testing, as there won't be a bunch of people
> wi
On 06/04/2020 12:53, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 4/6/20 1:43 PM, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>> There is a fix for #954244 in experimental but I there are other more
>> serious problems with mpich-3.4a4-2
>>
> Can't mpich in unstable be reverted to 3.3.3 which built successfully?
Yes, it coul
On 4/6/20 1:43 PM, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> There is a fix for #954244 in experimental but I there are other more
> serious problems with mpich-3.4a4-2
>
> Upstream quietly reset the soversion to 0 (as its an alpha package). The
> code works but any users of libmpich12 break.
>
> 3.4 when rele
Hi,
There is a fix for #954244 in experimental but I there are other more
serious problems with mpich-3.4a4-2
Upstream quietly reset the soversion to 0 (as its an alpha package). The
code works but any users of libmpich12 break.
3.4 when released will bump the soversion (it drops some symbols).
Hey Adam,
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 12:16:05PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote:
>
>I realise things are a little unusual right now, but it's about time
>that we started looking at dates for 10.4.
>
>I guess the biggest impact of current circumstances on the process is
>likely to be around image testing, a
Hi folks,
I realise things are a little unusual right now, but it's about time
that we started looking at dates for 10.4.
I guess the biggest impact of current circumstances on the process is
likely to be around image testing, as there won't be a bunch of people
with local access to Steve's mirro
On 28/03/2020 10:50, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit le 27/03/2020 à 13:29 :
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> On 22/03/2020 12:19, Gilles Filippini wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>>> Usertags:
Hi Samuel,
just FYI, though you might be aware already:
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.en.html#special-case-the-stable-updates-suite
describes stable-updates from a developers point of view and was recently
updated to fix "#896013: developers-reference: Should includ
10 matches
Mail list logo
