"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> Please go ahead.
Thanks! Uploaded.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?a...@monk.mit.edu
On Tuesday, February 25, 2020 4:19:42 PM EST Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Tue, 2020-02-18 at 00:50 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > This is the latest in the series of postfix 3.4 maintenance updates
> > for buster. The version is in bullseye already and I have it
On Tuesday, February 25, 2020 4:18:26 PM EST Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Tue, 2020-02-18 at 00:56 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > This is the next in the series of postfix 3.1 updates. It includes
> > the postfix 3.1 relevant fixes from 3.4.8 and 3.4.9 (as there
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Tue, 2020-02-18 at 00:56 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> This is the next in the series of postfix 3.1 updates. It includes
> the postfix 3.1 relevant fixes from 3.4.8 and 3.4.9 (as there was no
> companion 3.1 release with 3.4.8). The only other change is to add
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #951564 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package postfix/3.1.14-0+10debu1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
951564: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=951564
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Tue, 2020-02-18 at 00:50 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> This is the latest in the series of postfix 3.4 maintenance updates
> for buster. The version is in bullseye already and I have it running
> locally without issue. In addition to the upstream bugfixes, there
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #951563 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package postfix/3.4.8-0+10debu1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
951563: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=951563
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Fri, 2020-02-21 at 14:55 +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> we’d like to fix #946847 in buster (which is where we found it in
> production and tested a fix locally, which was later discovered to
> be identical to a recent upstream fix) because it’s a denial of
> servic
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #951769 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package sssd/1.16.3-3.1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
951769: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=951769
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #952414 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package ncbi-blast+/2.8.1-1+deb10u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
952414: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952414
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sun, 2020-02-23 at 20:23 -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Per #951280, x86 builds of ncbi-blast+ accidentally wound up
> requiring SSE 4.2, breaking execution on older processors. I've
> prepared an update (patch attached, or at [SALSA]) adding a configure
> flag that
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #951572 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package uml-utilities/20070815.2-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
951572: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=951572
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 15:37 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> So my changelog was incorrect as it set to 20070815.3-1+deb10u4,
> which actually should be 20070815.3-1+deb10u1, as this is uml-
> utilities package's first stable update proposed.
No. stable currently has
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 14:49 +0100, Santiago R.R. wrote:
> I would like to upload user-mode-linux to buster to fix this FTBFS:
> https://bugs.debian.org/951329. Ritesh Raj Sarraf (rrs) has already
> given his ACK.
>
The metadata for that bug suggests that it affects th
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #952441 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package
user-mode-linux/4.19-1um-1+b1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
952441: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952441
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing changes file: curl_7.52.1-5+deb9u10_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: curl_7.52.1-5+deb9u10_all.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: curl_7.52.1-5+deb9u10_amd64+buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: curl_7.52.1-5+deb9u10_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing ch
Processing changes file: curl_7.64.0-4+deb10u1_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: curl_7.64.0-4+deb10u1_all.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: curl_7.64.0-4+deb10u1_amd64+buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: curl_7.64.0-4+deb10u1_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing ch
On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 15:24:42 +0100 Laurent Bigonville
wrote:
> Could you please give me the greenlight to upload the new version of
> libgusb and then schedule a binNMU of fwupd (or all the rdeps if you
> prefere)
>
Any opinion on this?
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
This is a mini transition due to soname ABI changes in netcdf.
It only affects two packages: netcdf-parallel and adios, both of which
I maintain.
'netcdf-parallel' 4.7.3 now in experimen
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is the proper list to send this to, but I would
like to bring attention to
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=950578 and its
associated patch, as we believe this is all that stands between the next
Debian release and its ability to be used for netinst o
20 matches
Mail list logo
