Hi,
Am 4. Februar 2020 23:27:13 MEZ schrieb Simon McVittie :
>On Tue, 04 Feb 2020 at 21:20:07 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>> root@frodo:/# g-ir-scanner
>...
>> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'giscanner._giscanner'
>
>This is fixed in 1.62.0-5 (#950267).
Thanks, yes, that prevents the inst
On Tue, 04 Feb 2020 at 21:20:07 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> root@frodo:/# g-ir-scanner
...
> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'giscanner._giscanner'
This is fixed in 1.62.0-5 (#950267). Upload was delayed by FOSDEM, needing
a glib2.0 upload to be built first (to have the right Breaks for t
Processing changes file:
debian-installer-netboot-images_20190702+deb10u3_all.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
debian-installer-netboot-images_20170615+deb9u8_all.changes
ACCEPT
Oops.
On 04-02-2020 22:22, Paul Gevers wrote:
> The autopkgtest of wcc with the newly build openssh from
> proposed-updates fails due to a segfault. I re-triggered the test and it
> failed in the same way:
Forgot the links:
[Overview]
https://ci.debian.net/user/britney/jobs?package=wcc&trigger=&s
> As the 'pyro' maintainer, it should be removed from debian/unstable.
Please file a RM bug against ftp.debian.org, removals from unstable are
ftp-master territory.
Andreas
Hi Colin,
On 02-02-2020 20:11, Adam D Barratt wrote:
> package release.debian.org
> tags 948695 = buster pending
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
> the proposed-updates queue for Debian buster.
>
> Thanks for your contribution!
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Please remove radare2 from Stretch. There's a number of unfixed security issues
and upstream actively objects it's presence in a stable release: #950372
Cheers,
Moritz
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
See my earlier RM bug for radare2 itself.
Cheers,
Moritz
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Please remove radare2 from Buster. There's a number of unfixed security issues
and upstream actively objects it's presence in a stable release: #950372
(There's an rdep (radere2-cutter) to be re
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 08:24:50PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 2/3/20 8:22 PM, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > On Sun, 02 Feb 2020 at 09:35:04 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >> I think this is now in shape to be started.
> >
> > Please can this wait until the remaining bits of the libffi7 tra
Your message dated Tue, 4 Feb 2020 20:36:15 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#949326: transition: libgwenhywfar
has caused the Debian Bug report #949326,
regarding transition: libgwenhywfar
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 948477 + pending
Bug #948477 [release.debian.org] transition: openbabel
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 949185 + pending
Bug #949185 [release.debian.org] transition: libffi
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 948378 + pending
Bug #948378 [release.debia
Processing changes file:
debian-installer-netboot-images_20170615+deb9u8_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
debian-installer-netboot-images_20190702+deb10u3_source.changes
ACCEPT
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hello,
This update is part of a collaboration with upstream on their handling
of deprecations in the rubygems codebase. See
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/issues/3068 and the
> Most of the times when I take a detailed look on why it doesn't migrate,
> it leads to one of the few packages that currently are in NEW. I don't
> have the time right now to include it in this mail, but if desired I
> will assemble the list of required packages that are currently in NEW as
> soo
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 950542 950545 950547 950549 950550
Bug #950652 [wnpp] ITP: gcc64 -- compiler host64 and target 32 with multilib
950652 was not blocked by any bugs.
950652 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 950652: 950550, 950549, 950542, 950547, and 9505
Hi,
As the 'pyro' maintainer, it should be removed from debian/unstable.
Its only rdep is 'cylc', and the latest version of cylc (unstable) does
not use pyro; pyro is already removed from testing.
(cylc is awaiting a full new release that will be python3 clean, that
version (due now) will no
19 matches
Mail list logo
