Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Control: block 945985 by -1
nmu rdkit_201903.1-2 . ANY . unstable . -m 'Rebuild against
libschroedinger-maeparser-dev >= 1.2.2-1'
Hello,
I want to request binNMU for rdkit to rebuild it wi
Processing control commands:
> block 945985 by -1
Bug #945985 [src:rdkit] rdkit: rebuild with libschroedinger-maeparser1/1.2.2-1
945985 was not blocked by any bugs.
945985 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 945985: 946247
--
945985: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?
Hi Paul,
On 05.12.19 10:20, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Note: there is no need to create a new bug report for binNMU's that are
> part of a transition with a transition bug.
ok, thanks.
> That said, mips64el and mipsel FTBFS, can you please check what's going on?
I uploaded -4 which should fix this.
Processing control commands:
> block 944417 by -1
Bug #944417 [release.debian.org] transition: cgal
944417 was blocked by: 946228 946116 946119 944776 946114 944775 946223 946229
944417 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 944417: 946234
--
944417: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
Processing control commands:
> block 944417 by -1
Bug #944417 [release.debian.org] transition: cgal
944417 was blocked by: 946114 946119 946228 946116 946223 944775 944776
944417 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 944417: 946229
--
944417: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
Processing control commands:
> block 944417 by -1
Bug #944417 [release.debian.org] transition: cgal
944417 was blocked by: 944776 946116 946119 946223 944775 946114
944417 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 944417: 946228
--
944417: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?
Processing control commands:
> block 944417 by -1
Bug #944417 [release.debian.org] transition: cgal
944417 was blocked by: 944775 946119 946116 944776 946114
944417 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 944417: 946223
--
944417: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=944
On 2019-12-05 20:22, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi Drew,
On 02-12-2019 09:31, Drew Parsons wrote:
I'd like to proceed with the PETSc 3.12 transition.
The MUMPS 5.2.1 is also ready to go, but I think it might be more
constructive to demonstrate via testing migration that the new petsc
is stable with th
Hi guido,
Thank you very much for including my patches .
I only want to ask one question, why you removed patch which is adding test
for remove cpu features osxsave and ospke ?
In my previous debdiff it was included ->
https://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commit;h=b51bfa70554f4bc43cbd6841b78d6
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 12:56:17PM +0100, Michal Arbet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Debdiff is empty.
> Please, could you resend ?
odd, where did that go. Updated one attached.
-- Guido
>
> Thanks,
> Michal Arbet ( kevko )
>
> čt 5. 12. 2019 v 1:01 odesílatel Guido Günther napsal:
>
> > Hi,
> > On
Hi Drew,
On 02-12-2019 09:31, Drew Parsons wrote:
> I'd like to proceed with the PETSc 3.12 transition.
>
> The MUMPS 5.2.1 is also ready to go, but I think it might be more
> constructive to demonstrate via testing migration that the new petsc
> is stable with the old mumps than to show the new
Hi,
Debdiff is empty.
Please, could you resend ?
Thanks,
Michal Arbet ( kevko )
čt 5. 12. 2019 v 1:01 odesílatel Guido Günther napsal:
> Hi,
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 05:52:33PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 04:17:13PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > Contr
Hi,
On 03-12-2019 13:19, Matthias Klose wrote:
> It's unfortunate that issues for some packages only get attention when the
> severity of an issue is raised. Following your proposal means that the issue
> is
> probably ignored forever, and you don't propose a better way going forward,
> just
>
Hi Joachim,
Note: there is no need to create a new bug report for binNMU's that are
part of a transition with a transition bug.
That said, mips64el and mipsel FTBFS, can you please check what's going on?
On 04-12-2019 00:02, Joachim Reichel wrote:
> please schedule binNMUs for gudhi, openems, an
14 matches
Mail list logo