On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 5:13 PM Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > a proper fix would also have the advantage of keeping linkers for
> > *other* platforms (even 64 bit ones) out of swap-thrashing, saving
> > power consumption for build hardware and costing a lot less on SSD and
> > HDD regular replacement
Your message dated Thu, 15 Aug 2019 10:29:24 +0800
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#934725: Acknowledgement (nmu:
golang-github-google-pprof_0.0~git20190109.e84dfd6-1)
has caused the Debian Bug report #934725,
regarding nmu: golang-github-google-pprof_0.0~git20190109.e84dfd6-1
to be marke
Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.47+dfsg-3+deb10u1_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.44+dfsg-5+deb9u3_mips64el.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.44+dfsg-5+deb9u3_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.47+dfsg-3+deb10u1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.47+dfsg-3+deb10u1_mips64el.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.47+dfsg-3+deb10u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.47+dfsg-3+deb10u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.47+dfsg-3+deb10u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.44+dfsg-5+deb9u3_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.44+dfsg-5+deb9u3_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.44+dfsg-5+deb9u3_mips.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.44+dfsg-5+deb9u3_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.47+dfsg-3+deb10u1_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.44+dfsg-5+deb9u3_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.44+dfsg-5+deb9u3_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.44+dfsg-5+deb9u3_ppc64el.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.44+dfsg-5+deb9u3_s390x.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.47+dfsg-3+deb10u1_all.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.47+dfsg-3+deb10u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.47+dfsg-3+deb10u1_ppc64el.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.47+dfsg-3+deb10u1_s390x.
Processing changes file: libebml_1.3.4-1+deb9u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libebml_1.3.4-1+deb9u1_mips64el.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libebml_1.3.4-1+deb9u1_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libebml_1.3.4-1+deb9u1_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libebml_1.3.4-1+deb9u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libebml_1.3.4-1+deb9u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libebml_1.3.4-1+deb9u1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
Processing chang
Processing changes file: libebml_1.3.4-1+deb9u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libebml_1.3.4-1+deb9u1_s390x.changes
ACCEPT
Hi Gunnar,
Disclaimer, I haven't discussed this with the team, so what I write here
is my personal perception and opinion.
On 11-08-2019 05:26, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Dear Release Team members, I am reaching out to see what is your
> position regarding bug #932795, which in turn references
> #90782
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 03:09:27PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-08-11 at 14:56 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > Control: tag -1 confirmed pending
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 11:38:50AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > > After the release of buster, an upgrade issue was reporte
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 10:55:39AM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 02:05:52PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > For the time being, yes, and for the reasons outlined in the initial bug
> > report.
>
> Those were my (hopefully impartial) summary.
>
> I also went on to comme
Processing changes file: libebml_1.3.4-1+deb9u1_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openldap_2.4.44+dfsg-5+deb9u3_all.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: python-django_1.10.7-2+deb9u6_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ghostscript_9.27~dfsg-2+deb10u1_sourceonly.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ghostscript_9.27~dfsg-2+deb10u1_all.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ghostscript_9.27~dfsg-2+deb10u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ghostscript_9.27~dfsg-2+deb10u1
package release.debian.org
tags 934518 = stretch pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian stretch.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: libebml
Version: 1.3.4-1+deb9u1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> tags 934518 = stretch pending
Bug #934518 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: p
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> tags 934508 = stretch pending
Bug #934508 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: p
package release.debian.org
tags 934508 = stretch pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian stretch.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: openldap
Version: 2.4.44+dfsg-5
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> tags 934507 = buster pending
Bug #934507 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: pac
package release.debian.org
tags 934507 = buster pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian buster.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: openldap
Version: 2.4.47+dfsg-3+d
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 07:22:47PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 10:55:39AM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 02:05:52PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > > For the time being, yes, and for the reasons outlined in the initial bug
> > > report.
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear oldstable release managers,
Please consider monkeysphere (0.41-1+deb9u1) for stretch:
monkeysphere (0.41-1+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium
* Prevent a FTBFS by upd
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 06:25:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Please go ahead; thanks.
Thank you. Uploaded, accepted, and visible on the queue page now.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 06:24:32PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Please go ahead.
Thank you. Uploaded, accepted, and visible on the queue page now.
On 2019-08-09 16:26, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> ---
> crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
>
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 1:49 PM Ivo De Decker wrote:
> >
> > Hi Aurelien,
> >
> > On 8/8/19 10:38 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >
> > > 32-bit processes are ab
Hi,
On 2019-08-09 14:31, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> - For architectures to be included in a future stable release, they
> still need to be in good enough shape. I won't go into everything
> involved in architecture qualification in this mail, but I do want to
> mention that the buildd capacity f
Processing control commands:
> block 933577 by -1
Bug #933577 [release.debian.org] transition: evolution-data-server
933577 was blocked by: 933668 933573 934693
933577 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 933577: 934745
--
933577: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch d-i
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
glib2.0 in stretch has some minor security vulnerabilities for which
the security team have declined to issue DSAs: the most recent is also
pending review as a buster update (#9
Hi Francois,
[Important disclaimer: not part of the release team]
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:29:55PM -0700, Francois Marier wrote:
> There is now an additional CVE that affects pdfresurrect in buster and
> stretch:
>
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-14934
>
> Neither thi
35 matches
Mail list logo
