Turns out I had some extra time for this flying back from DebConf and it
needed changes to only one file for this, so new rdiff-backup with
librsync2 was uploaded yesterday...
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi SRM,
backup-manager is affected by an annoying bug, where when purging
remote (older) archives via FTP and SSH it fails because the actual
command which is invoked is
/usr/bin/ba
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
dma currently use the TLSv1_client_method() function that means that it
only support TLS 1.0 which is considered deprecated (and forbidden by
PCI certification).
For what I can
Your message dated Mon, 29 Jul 2019 21:11:31 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#933043: Acknowledgement (nmu: petsc_3.10.5+dfsg1-1)
has caused the Debian Bug report #933043,
regarding nmu: petsc_3.10.5+dfsg1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Ok I'll mark it on family calendar
On 29 July 2019 10:47:09 GMT-03:00, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>Ok, we have a winner. Let's make them both 7th September so press
>aren't
>under too much pressure.
>
>--
>Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
>Debian Developer
On 7/22/19 1:47 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Seem to be some merge artefacts here, including possibly an entire
> duplicate entry?
Indeed. Sorry for my mistake. Please find attached, the new (cleaner)
debdiff for this p-u.
Thomas
diff -Nru openvswitch-2.10.0+2018.08.28+git.8ca7c82b7d+ds1/debia
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 05:50:43PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> … in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931040#10
> it was indicated this should go into the first point release,
> and https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/07/msg2.html
> indicates that that w
Ok, we have a winner. Let's make them both 7th September so press aren't
under too much pressure.
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5
On Sat, 27, Jul, 2019 at 08:21:57PM -0300, Jonathan Wiltshire spoke thus..
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 08:36:30PM -0300, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 07:35:01PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > > - Auguest 31st
> > > - September 7th
> >
> > These look like the two opti
librsync2 is available in unstable, please binNMU burp, csync2 and
duplicity.
From https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/07/msg00093.html I guess
Otto (Cced) is interested in keeping rdiff-backup? In that case, Otto,
please prepare an upload with a fix.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Descrip
ma 29. heinäk. 2019 klo 10.25 Andrey Rahmatullin (w...@debian.org) kirjoitti:
>
> librsync2 is available in unstable, please binNMU burp, csync2 and
> duplicity.
>
> From https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/07/msg00093.html I guess
> Otto (Cced) is interested in keeping rdiff-backup? In tha
ma 29. heinäk. 2019 klo 10.39 Andrey Rahmatullin (w...@debian.org) kirjoitti:
>
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 10:36:57AM +0200, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> > > librsync2 is available in unstable, please binNMU burp, csync2 and
> > > duplicity.
> > >
> > > From https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/0
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 10:36:57AM +0200, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> > librsync2 is available in unstable, please binNMU burp, csync2 and
> > duplicity.
> >
> > From https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/07/msg00093.html I guess
> > Otto (Cced) is interested in keeping rdiff-backup? In that cas
Las líneas ICO 2019 ya están disponibles. 1. Empresas y
emprendedores 2019 Orientado a empresas y autónomos que realicen un
proyecto en territorio nacional o necesiten liquidez. Hasta 12.5 millones y
a 20 años. SABER MÁS 2. Crédito comercial 2019 Liquidez
mediante el anticipo de facturas proceden
Hi Adam,
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 10:46 PM Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
>
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On 2019-07-13 01:26, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> > I'd like to fix #931422 (see [1]) for stretch (the bug is already fixed
> > in unstable, see also #931967 [2]).
> >
> > The diff with the current 1:1
Hi Adam,
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 10:32 PM Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> On 2019-07-13 01:19, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> > I'd like to fix #931422 (see [1]) for buster (the bug is already fixed
> > in unstable and prospectively in testing).
> >
> > The diff with the current 1:1.4.8+dfsg-1 is attaced, it's
16 matches
Mail list logo