Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
I'd like to backport the security fixes and hardening in corekeeper
from buster to stretch.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
diff -Nru corekeeper-1.6/debian/changel
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 927084 by 928913
Bug #927084 [elpa-elpy] elpa-elpy: README.Debian misleads users into enabling
nonexistent Python 2 support
927084 was not blocked by any bugs.
927084 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 927084: 928913
> bloc
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear release team,
I would like to fix CVE-2018-19105 in Stretch too. I have prepared an
update, please find attached the debdiff.
Regards,
Markus
-- System Information:
Debian
Hi Dominik,
On 26/12/18 2:16 am, Dominik George wrote:
> Heisann, alle sammen,
>
> as announced in the recent thread about maintaining, I hereby propose a
> repository that allows making “backports” of packages available to users
> of the stable distribution, if those packages cannot be maintained
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package sa-exim:
Fixes have been made to address the issues that caused the Exim team to drop
the local_scan support (wich sa-exim admittedly is the only package
utilizing)
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2019 18:10:00 +
with message-id <49c96076-ac97-cd8d-25e2-c3baa6f72...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#929231: unblock: vit/1.3~beta1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #929231,
regarding unblock: vit/1.3~beta1-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package vit
Added missing runtime dependencies to make it usable out of the box.
I updated some meta data along the lines, hope that's fine.
Diff attached.
unblock vit/1.3~b
Control: tags -1 d-i confirmed
Simon McVittie:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>
> On Fri, 17 May 2019 at 18:59:00 +, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> I am ok with these changes on the premise that you are ready to promptly
>> rollback to the bare minimum changes in case of regressions (regardless
>> of
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 d-i confirmed
Bug #929132 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): dbus/1.12.14-1
Added tag(s) d-i.
--
929132: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=929132
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #929132 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): dbus/1.12.14-1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
929132: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=929132
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On Fri, 17 May 2019 at 18:59:00 +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I am ok with these changes on the premise that you are ready to promptly
> rollback to the bare minimum changes in case of regressions (regardless
> of whether we see them before or after the migration).
>
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # remove moreinfo tag as info has been provided for RT
> tags 926412 - moreinfo
Bug #926412 [release.debian.org] unblock: gnutls28/3.6.7-2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
9
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 4:06 AM Paul Gevers wrote:
>
> Hi Shengjing,
>
> On 18-05-2019 17:10, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 10:53 PM Paul Gevers wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Shengjijng,
> >>
> >> And how do we prevent that binNMU'ing all these reverse dependencies
> >> don't pick up oth
Dear Release Team,
we have been collecting with piuparts information about obsolete
conffiles that remain after dist-upgrades, but haven't acted (i.e.
filing bugs) on these issues so far.
The list for stretch -> buster is here:
https://piuparts.debian.org/stretch2buster/obsolete_conffiles_issue.h
> "Ian" == Ian Jackson writes:
Ian> (sending this because I got the release team address wrong) Ian
Ian> Jackson writes ("That merged-usr is mandatory is RC"):
>> Control: severity -1 serious
>>
>> In #923091, Guillem (with dpkg maintainer hat on) asks for a
>> base-i
Control: tags -1 confirmed d-i
Michael Biebl:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package systemd
>
> All patches are cherry-picked from upstream git.
>
> Annotated changelog:
>
> systemd (241-4)
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed d-i
Bug #929215 [release.debian.org] unblock: systemd/241-4
Added tag(s) d-i and confirmed.
--
929215: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=929215
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package systemd
All patches are cherry-picked from upstream git.
Annotated changelog:
systemd (241-4) unstable; urgency=medium
* journal-remote: Do not request Content-L
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2019 10:29:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#929204: unblock: scilab/6.0.1-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #929204,
regarding unblock: scilab/6.0.1-9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2019 10:26:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#929192: unblock: libgit2/0.27.7+dfsg.1-0.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #929192,
regarding unblock: libgit2/0.27.7+dfsg.1-0.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Unmaintained upstream, not usable inside debian/buster, low popcon
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (900, 'stable'), (499, 'testing'), (400, '
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2019 10:24:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#929191: unblock: rust-typenum/1.10.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #929191,
regarding unblock: rust-typenum/1.10.0-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi release team
To make your and our work easier, we would like to ask you to add a
package constraint for all the packages included into the official
Debianm cloud images.
>From what I read, the easiest way for you would be to specify a single
packag
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2019 09:55:00 +
with message-id <46bed459-733f-0369-8833-b31197ced...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#929190: unblock: cargo/0.33.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #929190,
regarding unblock: cargo/0.33.0-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package scilab
Fixes a RC bug (scilab-cli package doesn't start)
The change is trivial (don't remove some empty files)
unblock scilab/6.0.1-9
-- System Information:
Debian
On 2019-05-18 Paul Gevers wrote:
[gnutls]
> Is it reasonably possible to split of the CVE changes and patch the
> version currently in testing? That would be much more comfortable for
> us. Either by reverting the new upstream version with e.g. an +really
> version number, or, but less preferred b
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 10:00:17PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 16-05-2019 22:03, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 09:52:45PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> >> Well, if they are maintained by the QA group, there are at least around
> >> 90 people notified of stuff.
> >
> >
27 matches
Mail list logo
