Re: Bug#924554: SUCCESS messages: significant behaviour change

2019-04-25 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi there, Am 25.04.19 um 21:53 schrieb Sébastien Villemot: > On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 17:18:45 + Balint Reczey wrote: > >>* Skip sending email when no package had to be installed, upgraded or >> removed >> (LP: #1821103) (Closes: #924554) > > Any chance to have this issue fixed in bust

Bug#927984: unblock: lxqt-qtplugin/0.14.0-3

2019-04-25 Thread Alf Gaida
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package lxqt-qtplugin lxqt-qtplugin try to load libfm-qt.so instead of libfm-qt.so.6. (Closes: #927905) >From 9f3a044c94b042d41e88d0b9aed9b2f043de8231 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 20

Re: [buster] query about status of installation-guide and d-i release notes

2019-04-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi all, Paul Gevers (2019-04-25): > On 25-04-2019 08:11, Holger Wansing wrote: > > Paul Gevers wrote: > > First, I wonder why you ask personally me for this. > > Because the task was originally self-assigned to kibi and was > documented on the wiki [1] as "ask Holger". Right, this is entirely

Bug#927797: unblock: debian-archive-keyring/2019.1

2019-04-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi Niels, Niels Thykier (2019-04-23): > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: d-i > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Please unblock package debian-archive-keyring, which includes the new > signing keys for buster. > > """ > debian-archive-key

Bug#927980: unblock: librsvg/2.44.10-2.1 (pre-approval)

2019-04-25 Thread Boyuan Yang
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org 927...@bugs.debian.org Hello all, I have prepared an NMU to fix bug https://bugs.debian.org/927886 . This bug in librsvg caused d

Processed: Re: Bug#927860: RM: jboss-annotations-1.2-api/1.0.0-1

2019-04-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Bug #927860 [release.debian.org] RM: jboss-annotations-1.2-api/1.0.0-1 Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'ftp.debian.org'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #927860 to the same values previously set Ignoring

Bug#927860: RM: jboss-annotations-1.2-api/1.0.0-1

2019-04-25 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Control: retitle -1 RM: jboss-annotations-1.2-api -- ROM; duplicate On 24-04-2019 11:18, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Timo, > > On 24-04-2019 10:28, Timo Aaltonen wrote: >> Dogtag-pki needed this, but I wasn't aware that another version >> was already being packaged

Dropping the ntfs kernel module

2019-04-25 Thread Ben Hutchings
Linux's ntfs kernel module, supporting Windows's native filesystem, has three security issues open against it (CVE-2018-12929, CVE-2018-12930, CVE-2018-12931) and there is no sign of progress towards fixing them upstream. This module is limited to read-only functionality by default; its write supp

Re: [buster] query about status of installation-guide and d-i release notes

2019-04-25 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Holger, On 25-04-2019 08:11, Holger Wansing wrote: > Paul Gevers wrote: > First, I wonder why you ask personally me for this. Because the task was originally self-assigned to kibi and was documented on the wiki [1] as "ask Holger". > Why not ask the debian-boot team? See above. I didn't in

Bug#927959: unblock: node-fresh/0.2.0-2

2019-04-25 Thread Xavier Guimard
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package node-fresh Hi all, node-fresh is vulnerable to CVE-2017-16119 (#927715). Vulnerability is due to Node.js regexp parsing DDOS. I imported and adapted upstream patch t

Bug#927958: [pre-a] unblock: utf8proc/2.3.0-1

2019-04-25 Thread Mo Zhou
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package utf8proc (explain the reason for the unblock here) I'm astonished that the unicode (11.* -> 12.*) transition happend at such a deep freeze stage. utf8proc is tightly

Re: Handling Japanese new era "令和 (Reiwa)"

2019-04-25 Thread Alastair McKinstry
On 12/04/2019 10:32, Alastair McKinstry wrote: On 09/04/2019 02:18, Hideki Yamane wrote: Hi, Hi I've noticed that Japan renews its era from 平成 (Heisei) to 令和 (Reiwa) (U+32FF) at 1st May and it's necessary to update some packages to deal with it. > To Release Managers How do we handl