Processing changes file: linux_4.9.144-3.1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux_4.9.144-3.1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux_4.9.144-3.1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux_4.9.144-3.1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux_4.9.144-3.1_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux_4.9.144-3.1_s390x.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux_4.9.144-3.1_all.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux_4.9.144-3.1_ppc64el.changes
ACCEPT
Package: debbugs
Version: 2.6.0
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Hi Don,
You may have noticed that I file a lot of bugs nowadays against two
source packages due to autopkgtest failures in testing with one or more
packages from unstable. Typically, I file them against
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 06:11:27PM +, miel...@t-online.de wrote:
>
> Ladies and gentlemen,
>
> I tried to update a debian squeeze OS, with a
> /etc/apt/sources.list
Debian 6 "Squeeze" stopped receiving security and errata updates in 2014.
You should upgrade to a supported release as soon as
Ladies and gentlemen,
I tried to update a debian squeeze OS, with a
/etc/apt/sources.list
deb http://archive.debian.org/debian/ squeeze contrib main non-free
I got
GPG error: http://archive.debian.org squeeze Release: The following signatures
were invalid: KEYEXPIRED 1520281423 KEYEXPIRED 1
Processing changes file: linux_4.9.144-3.1_source.changes
ACCEPT
> Hi Thomas,
>> Dear Andreas,
>>
>> Thanks for taking care of toulbar2. I did spend some time to try to go
>> around this #920459 bug but even a postprocessing of the LaTeX output of
>> doxygen (removing inclusion of the xcolor package that generates the
>> LaTeX compilation issue) did not work (an
Sorry, missed the Reply-All as Andreas pointed out. See attached mail.
Thomas
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 11:15:13AM +0100, Thomas Schiex wrote:
> Dear Andreas,
>
> Thanks for taking care of toulbar2. I did spend some time to try to go
> around this #920459 bug bu
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 11:13:29AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 09:07:24AM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> > I believe that it was the case before that if the autoremoval was due a
> > specific RC bug, any activity on that specific bug would reset the timer
> > for autoremova
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 09:07:24AM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> I believe that it was the case before that if the autoremoval was due a
> specific RC bug, any activity on that specific bug would reset the timer for
> autoremoval.
I've thought the same but despite the activity it is not reset (at
Processing changes file: postgresql-9.6_9.6.12-0+deb9u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Subvenciones para Pymes Subvenciones Subvenciones a fondo perdido para
pymes. Saber más • Subvenciones europeas,
nacionales y de las comunidades autónomas. • Buscador de
subvenciones de toda clase para todo el territorio nacional. • Alertas
programables. • Gestión incluída.
Quiero saber
Hi,
I believe that it was the case before that if the autoremoval was due a
specific RC bug, any activity on that specific bug would reset the timer for
autoremoval.
But it might have changed since… or my memory is failing me.
Cheers,
Ondrej
> On 19 Feb 2019, at 08:46, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
