Processed: firmware-nonfree 20161130-4 flagged for acceptance

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #910969 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package firmware-nonfree/20161130-4 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #910969 to the same tags previously set -- 910969: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=910969 Debian Bug Tracking

Bug#910969: firmware-nonfree 20161130-4 flagged for acceptance

Control: tags -1 + pending Hi, The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into the proposed-updates queue for Debian . Thanks for your contribution! Upload details == Package: firmware-nonfree Version: 20161130-4 Explanation: fix security issues in B

Processed: firmware-nonfree 20161130-4 flagged for acceptance

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #910969 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package firmware-nonfree/20161130-4 Added tag(s) pending. -- 910969: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=910969 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: lastpass-cli: error: Peer certificate cannot be authenticated with given CA certificates

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 911767 lastpass-cli Bug #911767 [release.debian.org] stable-pu: package lastpass-cli/1.0.0-1.2+deb9u1 Added indication that 911767 affects lastpass-cli > block 898940 by 911767 Bug #898940 {Done: Chris Lamb } [lastpass-cli] lastpass-cli:

Bug#911767: stable-pu: package lastpass-cli/1.0.0-1.2+deb9u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: stable User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Dear stable release managers, Please consider lastpass-cli (1.0.0-1.2+deb9u1) for stable: lastpass-cli (1.0.0-1.2+deb9u1) stable; urgency=medium * Backport hardcoded cer

Bug#901015: transition: protobuf

On 10/24/18 3:54 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > If "a rebuild is required to make them compatible", you should add > Breaks against those versions, as it maeans the new protobuf is not > compatible to them and coinstallation should be prevented. > That would also hint britney to trigger autopkgtest wi

Bug#901015: transition: protobuf

On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 03:47:47PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > I think these regressions should not add a delay to testing migration as > autopkgtests are passing in unstable and a rebuild is required to make > them compatible with new protobuf version. > > autopkgtest for gazebo/9.0.0+dfsg5-4.

Bug#901015: transition: protobuf

Hi Emilio, I think these regressions should not add a delay to testing migration as autopkgtests are passing in unstable and a rebuild is required to make them compatible with new protobuf version. autopkgtest for gazebo/9.0.0+dfsg5-4.2: amd64: Regression ♻ autopkgtest for ignition-msgs/1.0.0+dfs