Your message dated Sat, 15 Sep 2018 06:41:00 +
with message-id <7e0169e7-7cca-f5ec-37b6-60b1b6b6f...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#875809: transition: ros-ros-comm
has caused the Debian Bug report #875809,
regarding transition: ros-ros-comm
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Your message dated Sat, 15 Sep 2018 06:41:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#891876: transition: poco
has caused the Debian Bug report #891876,
regarding transition: poco
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Sat, 15 Sep 2018 06:42:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#900263: transition: ros-geometry2
has caused the Debian Bug report #900263,
regarding transition: ros-geometry2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Sat, 15 Sep 2018 06:41:00 +
with message-id <08c5fd4a-69d6-18d6-57ae-16c3958a2...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#886354: transition: ros-bond-core
has caused the Debian Bug report #886354,
regarding transition: ros-bond-core
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Sat, 15 Sep 2018 06:36:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#881330: transition: poco
has caused the Debian Bug report #881330,
regarding transition: poco
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Sat, 15 Sep 2018 06:33:00 +
with message-id <52f1dc47-967d-02f9-f809-97fd8a33b...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#902867: transition: ros-ros-comm
has caused the Debian Bug report #902867,
regarding transition: ros-ros-comm
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Your message dated Sat, 15 Sep 2018 06:33:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#902034: transition: ros-geometric-shapes
has caused the Debian Bug report #902034,
regarding transition: ros-geometric-shapes
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 15 Sep 2018 06:32:00 +
with message-id <169bbaf5-bfa3-79a5-376e-81df14363...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#901974: transition: ros-class-loader
has caused the Debian Bug report #901974,
regarding transition: ros-class-loader
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Sat, 15 Sep 2018 06:32:00 +
with message-id <06eb8366-61e0-99b7-43b0-dc2dd0934...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#901815: transition: ros-geometry
has caused the Debian Bug report #901815,
regarding transition: ros-geometry
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Your message dated Sat, 15 Sep 2018 06:31:00 +
with message-id <5a7cbb73-d530-675a-26b2-1da01db53...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#884605: transition: mumps
has caused the Debian Bug report #884605,
regarding transition: mumps
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Sat, 15 Sep 2018 06:30:00 +
with message-id <102eb140-7825-844c-34dd-a5f276e66...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#864650: transition: mumps
has caused the Debian Bug report #864650,
regarding transition: mumps
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Sat, 15 Sep 2018 06:29:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#871911: transition: poco
has caused the Debian Bug report #871911,
regarding transition: poco
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Sat, 15 Sep 2018 06:28:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#872910: transition: scalapack
has caused the Debian Bug report #872910,
regarding transition: scalapack
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Sat, 15 Sep 2018 06:25:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#868722: transition: notmuch
has caused the Debian Bug report #868722,
regarding transition: notmuch
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Sat, 15 Sep 2018 06:28:00 +
with message-id <03c4f8e3-649d-7139-f6f7-86593aa95...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#873102: [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick
has caused the Debian Bug report #873102,
regarding transition: imagemagick
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sat, 15 Sep 2018 06:29:00 +
with message-id <5636eddb-c267-1c62-859e-9db5c1bc1...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#869956: transition: libevent 2.1.8-stable-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #869956,
regarding transition: libevent 2.1.8-stable-2
to be marked as done.
T
Your message dated Sat, 15 Sep 2018 06:24:00 +
with message-id <786807e9-3170-9662-5319-d851bc956...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#868362: transition: libofx7
has caused the Debian Bug report #868362,
regarding transition: libofx7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Sat, 15 Sep 2018 06:25:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#868540: transition: libprelude
has caused the Debian Bug report #868540,
regarding transition: libprelude
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Sat, 15 Sep 2018 06:23:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#868146: transition: alglib
has caused the Debian Bug report #868146,
regarding transition: alglib
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Sat, 15 Sep 2018 06:22:00 +
with message-id <368a475e-bcd2-a7e5-bf8f-7d2b6bd42...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#862305: transition: libwebp
has caused the Debian Bug report #862305,
regarding transition: libwebp
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 09:51:07 +0200
=?UTF-8?B?TMOhc3psw7MgQsO2c3rDtnJtw6lueWkgKEdDUyk=?= wrote:
> The last package which fails is gazebo which seems to be team
> maintained but it has two NMUs already. There's no bug reported here
> for the protobuf update but upstream aware of it and has a patch[1
Processing control commands:
> block 901015 by -1
Bug #901015 [release.debian.org] transition: protobuf
901015 was blocked by: 900621
901015 was blocking: 900522 903780
Added blocking bug(s) of 901015: 908854
> tag -1 fixed-upstream, patch
Bug #908854 [gazebo] gazebo FTBFS with protobuf 3.6 (fixed
Dear all,
We are nearly there to enable migration being gated by autopkgtest
results. Unfortunately I recently realized (after implementation and
deployment of what I thought would be the solution) that the current
situation is possibly not good enough yet. I'd like to solicit for your
help on det
23 matches
Mail list logo
