Re: Bug#903211: release.debian.org: How to handle unbuildable packages in buster

Santiago Vila wrote: >> I wish I could say unconditionally yes, but I am not sure we are ready >> for it yet. If your testing can trivially say which relation in >> Build-Depends/Build-Depends-Arch is broken, you could cross reference it >> with the [excuses] and see if they are permanently rejec

Bug#878816: stretch-pu: package lttng-modules/2.9.0-1+deb9u1

Hi, Here is an updated debdiff with a fix for an additional bug, both are failure to build the dkms modules on recent kernels. I've also addressed the metadata problems on #864404 to properly report the fixed version in unstable. Changes: lttng-modules (2.9.0-1+deb9u1) stable; urgency=medium

Bug#903211: release.debian.org: How to handle unbuildable packages in buster

> I wish I could say unconditionally yes, but I am not sure we are ready > for it yet. If your testing can trivially say which relation in > Build-Depends/Build-Depends-Arch is broken, you could cross reference it > with the [excuses] and see if they are permanently rejected due (and why). > > I