In data sabato 28 luglio 2018 10:13:19 CEST, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha scritto:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 27/07/18 23:05, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> >
> > Dear
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu dose3_5.0.1-11 . ANY . buster . -m "recompile against camlzip 1.07"
This should fix #905016.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (700,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear stable release manager,
I hereby propose an update for stretch of mruby. It contains a patch
fixing CVE-2017-9527 [1]. The security issue was marked as being
no-DSA [2].
The
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 904777 with 905034
Bug #904777 [release.debian.org] transition: libraw
904777 was blocked by: 905032
904777 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 904777: 905034
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 904777 with 905032
Bug #904777 [release.debian.org] transition: libraw
904777 was not blocked by any bugs.
904777 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 904777: 905032
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 904777 with 905035
Bug #904777 [release.debian.org] transition: libraw
904777 was blocked by: 905032 905034
904777 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 904777: 905035
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 05:59:28PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>...
> - armel: The armv4t default isn't used very much anymore,
The baseline is armv5te since last year.
> and we had issues in the past.
Could you elaborate on that?
The latest major issue I am aware of was about #727621 and the
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 08:43:02PM +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote...
>
> > I'd like to get a clear picture regarding the situation of building
> > armel for buster on arm64, ideally moving it to arm64 hardwre soon.
>
> JFTR, I'd appreciate if armel/armhf could continue to be p
Hi! mips64el still needs to build qttools-opensource-src so we can't ask for
normal binNMUs, but would it be possible to start them with dep-waits, at very
least for dependencies leves 1 and 2?
The reason why I'm asking this is to let both users and other DDs to continue
using/working with thei
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 09:29:01AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Thu, 2018-07-26 at 12:45 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > sddm in stable is affected by the following issues, which are both
> > fixed in unstable already and I would like to propose a
10 matches
Mail list logo